Czech farmers’ attitudes towards genetically modified crops
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00120865" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00120865 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074301672031706X" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074301672031706X</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.11.010" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.11.010</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Czech farmers’ attitudes towards genetically modified crops
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The risk management of the production of genetically modified (GM) crops on the farm level in the EU relies heavily on the compliance of farmers with specific rules. Such compliance may vary depending on the attitudes and practices of individual farmers. However, the published literature has predominantly focused on the experience of the adopters of GM crops and the interest of farmers in growing potentially permitted GM crops rather than on understanding farmers’ attitudes. This study aims at contributing to this field by exploring the attitudes of farmers who cultivated GM maize and their non-GM conventional and organic neighbours in the context of public discourses in the Czech Republic. The results of a sociological discourse analysis of interviews with twenty-two farmers revealed supportive and opposing attitudes towards GM crops. The dividing line of the discourses was not between adopters and non-adopters of GM maize but rather between farmers operating in conventional and organic agriculture. Most of the Czech farmers were supportive of the cultivation of GM crops. They perceived GM crops as safe, praised their benefits, and justified their cultivation ethically. Furthermore, they considered GM crops inevitable, equated them with progress, and looked up to the progressive USA. Only a few of the farmers opposed GM crops by emphasising their risks and their doubts about their safety, challenging the legitimacy of industrial risk assessment, and raising the ethical issues. Compared to other European farmers, the Czech farmers who were interviewed were exceptionally positive about GM crops. The farmers’ discourse which was supportive of GM crops was co-constituted by the power of the dominant Czech public GMO discourse, which is uncritical and supportive of the use of GM crops.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Czech farmers’ attitudes towards genetically modified crops
Popis výsledku anglicky
The risk management of the production of genetically modified (GM) crops on the farm level in the EU relies heavily on the compliance of farmers with specific rules. Such compliance may vary depending on the attitudes and practices of individual farmers. However, the published literature has predominantly focused on the experience of the adopters of GM crops and the interest of farmers in growing potentially permitted GM crops rather than on understanding farmers’ attitudes. This study aims at contributing to this field by exploring the attitudes of farmers who cultivated GM maize and their non-GM conventional and organic neighbours in the context of public discourses in the Czech Republic. The results of a sociological discourse analysis of interviews with twenty-two farmers revealed supportive and opposing attitudes towards GM crops. The dividing line of the discourses was not between adopters and non-adopters of GM maize but rather between farmers operating in conventional and organic agriculture. Most of the Czech farmers were supportive of the cultivation of GM crops. They perceived GM crops as safe, praised their benefits, and justified their cultivation ethically. Furthermore, they considered GM crops inevitable, equated them with progress, and looked up to the progressive USA. Only a few of the farmers opposed GM crops by emphasising their risks and their doubts about their safety, challenging the legitimacy of industrial risk assessment, and raising the ethical issues. Compared to other European farmers, the Czech farmers who were interviewed were exceptionally positive about GM crops. The farmers’ discourse which was supportive of GM crops was co-constituted by the power of the dominant Czech public GMO discourse, which is uncritical and supportive of the use of GM crops.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Rural Studies
ISSN
0743-0167
e-ISSN
1873-1392
Svazek periodika
83
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
April
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
246-256
Kód UT WoS článku
000636688600025
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85097092025