‘A Milestone in the History of Slovakia’ : Two Narratives about the 2015 Referendum on Family in Slovakia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00125030" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00125030 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://sreview.soc.cas.cz/corproof.php?tartkey=csr-000000-0012" target="_blank" >https://sreview.soc.cas.cz/corproof.php?tartkey=csr-000000-0012</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/csr.2020.047" target="_blank" >10.13060/csr.2020.047</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
‘A Milestone in the History of Slovakia’ : Two Narratives about the 2015 Referendum on Family in Slovakia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper examines a discursive controversy that arose in Slovakia after a conservative civic association initiated a referendum to protect ‘traditional families’ against the supposed encroachment of LGBTI rights. The 2015 referendum represents a tipping point in the formation of a new Slovak conservative political front. In this article, meaning making among actors civically engaged in the referendum is brought to light by re-constructing the deep cultural structures in which they are immersed. Drawing upon the strong programme in cultural sociology, I analyse the master narratives woven through the discourse of the referendum organisers and boycotters. These narratives are re-constructed from 20 semi-structured interviews with the engaged actors and a corpus of 82 written documents, such as blogs, speeches, and declarations concerning the referendum. The analysis employs the methods of thick description and the structural analysis of narrative genres. It shows that, first, the referendum controversy presents a clash between a narrative of social decline and a narrative of social progress. The narratives serve as moral regulators by deploying emotionally loaded images of nostalgia for ‘traditional families’ and a utopia of unconditional progress. Second, although both narratives interpret the referendum as a milestone in the history of Slovakia, they do so in different genres with specific implications for action. Using the example of the decision by referendum opponents to withdraw from the prereferendum debates, I demonstrate how narrative genres as implicit and deep cultural structures have the power to orient action and shape the contours of controversy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
‘A Milestone in the History of Slovakia’ : Two Narratives about the 2015 Referendum on Family in Slovakia
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper examines a discursive controversy that arose in Slovakia after a conservative civic association initiated a referendum to protect ‘traditional families’ against the supposed encroachment of LGBTI rights. The 2015 referendum represents a tipping point in the formation of a new Slovak conservative political front. In this article, meaning making among actors civically engaged in the referendum is brought to light by re-constructing the deep cultural structures in which they are immersed. Drawing upon the strong programme in cultural sociology, I analyse the master narratives woven through the discourse of the referendum organisers and boycotters. These narratives are re-constructed from 20 semi-structured interviews with the engaged actors and a corpus of 82 written documents, such as blogs, speeches, and declarations concerning the referendum. The analysis employs the methods of thick description and the structural analysis of narrative genres. It shows that, first, the referendum controversy presents a clash between a narrative of social decline and a narrative of social progress. The narratives serve as moral regulators by deploying emotionally loaded images of nostalgia for ‘traditional families’ and a utopia of unconditional progress. Second, although both narratives interpret the referendum as a milestone in the history of Slovakia, they do so in different genres with specific implications for action. Using the example of the decision by referendum opponents to withdraw from the prereferendum debates, I demonstrate how narrative genres as implicit and deep cultural structures have the power to orient action and shape the contours of controversy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Sociologický časopis
ISSN
0038-0288
e-ISSN
2336-128X
Svazek periodika
58
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
309-333
Kód UT WoS článku
000887967300004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85136905100