A New Impetus for the European Crisis Literature

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00130386" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00130386 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/pce-2022-0020" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/pce-2022-0020</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0020" target="_blank" >10.2478/pce-2022-0020</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A New Impetus for the European Crisis Literature

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The review essay presents European crisis literature, which tests the theories of European integration. It argues that the existing research on European crises and subsequent reactions by the European Union is fragmented, non-systematic and works with a too-implicit definition of ‘crisis’. The reviewed literature comments on turbulent developments in the European Union rather than providing comprehensive empirical research. The article demonstrates existing gaps and suggests a conceptualisation of the research topic. It also promotes a systematic research framework enabling a proper analysis of the European crises and the European Union’s reactions. Such a framework is based on a clear definition of the relevant actors and crisis situations and the identification of an empirical basis for analysis. The author argues that a systematic approach could enhance researchers’ ability to understand reactions to turbulence in European integration better and even predict the European Union’s responses to future events.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A New Impetus for the European Crisis Literature

Popis výsledku anglicky

The review essay presents European crisis literature, which tests the theories of European integration. It argues that the existing research on European crises and subsequent reactions by the European Union is fragmented, non-systematic and works with a too-implicit definition of ‘crisis’. The reviewed literature comments on turbulent developments in the European Union rather than providing comprehensive empirical research. The article demonstrates existing gaps and suggests a conceptualisation of the research topic. It also promotes a systematic research framework enabling a proper analysis of the European crises and the European Union’s reactions. Such a framework is based on a clear definition of the relevant actors and crisis situations and the identification of an empirical basis for analysis. The author argues that a systematic approach could enhance researchers’ ability to understand reactions to turbulence in European integration better and even predict the European Union’s responses to future events.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50600 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Politics in Central Europe

ISSN

1801-3422

e-ISSN

1801-3422

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

463-476

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85140781928