Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Debating irregular migration in the European Parliament : a ‘parliament without a public’ or the voice of the people?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F23%3A00129974" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/23:00129974 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108" target="_blank" >10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Debating irregular migration in the European Parliament : a ‘parliament without a public’ or the voice of the people?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The European Parliament (EP) has been characterised as a ‘working parliament without a public’ rather than as a ‘debating parliament’. However, this distinction was called into question when irregular migration became a sensitive topic and national political parties became polarised on this policy. Thus, this article explores whether one risk resulting from such a characterisation – a lack of public involvement – is raised by EU members in plenary debates on irregular migration issues. In particular, the analysis focuses on the purpose of EU plenaries and investigates the audience for speech acts in EP debates on irregular migration issues. The qualitative, manual content analysis of three debates shows that MEPs address their speeches to multiple audiences, including other MEPs, political groups and members of the Commission and Council, excluding national parties and voters. Speech acts aimed at EU officials, together with problem-solving argumentation, support the characterisation of the EP as a ‘working parliament without a public’. It contributes to maintaining the EU communication gap. In contrast, speakers legitimate their speeches by claiming to represent the common people, to be the vox populi. The article concludes by challenging the role of plenary debates in an age of rising Euroscepticism and populism.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Debating irregular migration in the European Parliament : a ‘parliament without a public’ or the voice of the people?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The European Parliament (EP) has been characterised as a ‘working parliament without a public’ rather than as a ‘debating parliament’. However, this distinction was called into question when irregular migration became a sensitive topic and national political parties became polarised on this policy. Thus, this article explores whether one risk resulting from such a characterisation – a lack of public involvement – is raised by EU members in plenary debates on irregular migration issues. In particular, the analysis focuses on the purpose of EU plenaries and investigates the audience for speech acts in EP debates on irregular migration issues. The qualitative, manual content analysis of three debates shows that MEPs address their speeches to multiple audiences, including other MEPs, political groups and members of the Commission and Council, excluding national parties and voters. Speech acts aimed at EU officials, together with problem-solving argumentation, support the characterisation of the EP as a ‘working parliament without a public’. It contributes to maintaining the EU communication gap. In contrast, speakers legitimate their speeches by claiming to represent the common people, to be the vox populi. The article concludes by challenging the role of plenary debates in an age of rising Euroscepticism and populism.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2023

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Contemporary European Studies

  • ISSN

    1478-2804

  • e-ISSN

    1478-2790

  • Svazek periodika

    31

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    874-888

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000807605200001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85131602530