Freedom and Gender Equality in EU Family Policy Tools

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F24%3A00134973" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/24:00134973 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-policy-and-society/article/freedom-and-gender-equality-in-eu-family-policy-tools/BC7EA7C6267531B2A8CA169A0669929E" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-policy-and-society/article/freedom-and-gender-equality-in-eu-family-policy-tools/BC7EA7C6267531B2A8CA169A0669929E</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000737" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1474746421000737</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Freedom and Gender Equality in EU Family Policy Tools

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this article is to look critically at the implications of gender equality concepts for individual freedom as conceptualised by the philosopher Isaiah Berlin. The scientific literature addressing the problem of freedom and gender equality with regard to public policy is considerably fragmented. Based on contextual literature, this article will offer four concepts of freedom that serve as analytical categories. I will analyse work/family reconciliation policy tools as introduced at the level of the European Union and reconnect them to three traditions of gender equality. The article reflects on historically embedded dichotomy between positive and negative freedom visible in gendered distinction between public and private. The main findings show that the relationship between freedom and equality is mediated by the selected policy tools suggesting that some policy tools expand freedom of all individuals while others indicate a possible limit for freedom.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Freedom and Gender Equality in EU Family Policy Tools

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this article is to look critically at the implications of gender equality concepts for individual freedom as conceptualised by the philosopher Isaiah Berlin. The scientific literature addressing the problem of freedom and gender equality with regard to public policy is considerably fragmented. Based on contextual literature, this article will offer four concepts of freedom that serve as analytical categories. I will analyse work/family reconciliation policy tools as introduced at the level of the European Union and reconnect them to three traditions of gender equality. The article reflects on historically embedded dichotomy between positive and negative freedom visible in gendered distinction between public and private. The main findings show that the relationship between freedom and equality is mediated by the selected policy tools suggesting that some policy tools expand freedom of all individuals while others indicate a possible limit for freedom.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Social Policy and Society

ISSN

1474-7464

e-ISSN

1475-3073

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

243-260

Kód UT WoS článku

000727531500001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85120981965