Prime ministerial political leadership and the domestic politics of Brexit : Theresa May and Boris Johnson compared

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F24%3A00135170" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/24:00135170 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Prime ministerial political leadership and the domestic politics of Brexit : Theresa May and Boris Johnson compared

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article explores and compares the political leadership of two successive British Prime Ministers, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, in their handling of the domestic politics of Brexit. Despite some similar dilemmas at the beginning of their premierships, their leadership delivered very different outcomes. The key argument developed here, using Richard Heffernan’s power resources model, is that the explanation for these outcomes does not only arise from a different political context and circumstances under which each prime minister pursued their Brexit policy. Rather Johnson, unlike May, made skilful use of the power resources at his command. He possessed more personal power resources and drew upon the available institutional power resources more effectively than May. As a result, unlike May, he was able to be predominant in his government’s Brexit policy. While we demonstrate the continued analytical value of Heffernan’s model, we also point to its limitations and suggest how it can be revised.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Prime ministerial political leadership and the domestic politics of Brexit : Theresa May and Boris Johnson compared

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article explores and compares the political leadership of two successive British Prime Ministers, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, in their handling of the domestic politics of Brexit. Despite some similar dilemmas at the beginning of their premierships, their leadership delivered very different outcomes. The key argument developed here, using Richard Heffernan’s power resources model, is that the explanation for these outcomes does not only arise from a different political context and circumstances under which each prime minister pursued their Brexit policy. Rather Johnson, unlike May, made skilful use of the power resources at his command. He possessed more personal power resources and drew upon the available institutional power resources more effectively than May. As a result, unlike May, he was able to be predominant in his government’s Brexit policy. While we demonstrate the continued analytical value of Heffernan’s model, we also point to its limitations and suggest how it can be revised.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

British Politics

ISSN

1746-918X

e-ISSN

1746-9198

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

268-287

Kód UT WoS článku

001050432300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85168115508