A Populist Incitement? Populism, Attack Rhetoric, and Support for Political Violence
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F24%3A00137618" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/24:00137618 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Populist Incitement? Populism, Attack Rhetoric, and Support for Political Violence
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Populists are known for their aggressive and uncompromising political style, and for rewarding a more combative behavior in their followers. Yet, virtually no evidence exists that aggressive populist rhetoric has an inciting effect among their followers towards greater support for political violence against political opponents. In this article, we present novel experimental evidence from four countries (Argentina, Czechia, Germany, Italy), assessing whether exposure to populist negative campaigning triggers greater support for political violence among their supporters. While we find only marginal evidence when looking at attacks in general, uncivil attacks from populists seem associated with a clearer uptick in support for violence among their followers – especially more severe forms of it (e.g., shooting political opponents). These results shed a new light on the intersection between populism, aggressive rhetoric, and radical partisanship, and have profound implications for a more comprehensive understanding of the roots of political violence in the public. All data and materials are openly available for replication.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Populist Incitement? Populism, Attack Rhetoric, and Support for Political Violence
Popis výsledku anglicky
Populists are known for their aggressive and uncompromising political style, and for rewarding a more combative behavior in their followers. Yet, virtually no evidence exists that aggressive populist rhetoric has an inciting effect among their followers towards greater support for political violence against political opponents. In this article, we present novel experimental evidence from four countries (Argentina, Czechia, Germany, Italy), assessing whether exposure to populist negative campaigning triggers greater support for political violence among their supporters. While we find only marginal evidence when looking at attacks in general, uncivil attacks from populists seem associated with a clearer uptick in support for violence among their followers – especially more severe forms of it (e.g., shooting political opponents). These results shed a new light on the intersection between populism, aggressive rhetoric, and radical partisanship, and have profound implications for a more comprehensive understanding of the roots of political violence in the public. All data and materials are openly available for replication.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů