We Were In! The Czech Parliament and the EU Council Presidency of 2022

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F25%3A00142103" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/25:00142103 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2025.2563561" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2025.2563561</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2025.2563561" target="_blank" >10.1080/14782804.2025.2563561</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

We Were In! The Czech Parliament and the EU Council Presidency of 2022

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the role of national parliaments (NPs) in EUPresidencies, focusing on the Czech EU Presidency in 2022. Usingthe analytical framework of Kaniok and Nováková 2023, this studyintegrates empirical analysis with theoretical insights to assess EUPresidency related parliamentary activities during the Czech man-date. Apart from empirically testing the Kaniok and Novákováframework, we also investigate whether the Czech parliament fol-lowed its roles in the EU affairs or whether the EU Presidencyrepresented a change for it. Our findings suggest that the CzechParliament primarily adhered to established roles, with one notableexception – an increased inter-parliamentary cooperation, goingbeyond the expected behaviour. This study contributes to theunderstanding of NPs in post-Lisbon EU politics and enriches thediscourse on the parliamentary dimension of the EU Presidency,offering insights into the interplay between national legislativeaction and EU governance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

We Were In! The Czech Parliament and the EU Council Presidency of 2022

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the role of national parliaments (NPs) in EUPresidencies, focusing on the Czech EU Presidency in 2022. Usingthe analytical framework of Kaniok and Nováková 2023, this studyintegrates empirical analysis with theoretical insights to assess EUPresidency related parliamentary activities during the Czech man-date. Apart from empirically testing the Kaniok and Novákováframework, we also investigate whether the Czech parliament fol-lowed its roles in the EU affairs or whether the EU Presidencyrepresented a change for it. Our findings suggest that the CzechParliament primarily adhered to established roles, with one notableexception – an increased inter-parliamentary cooperation, goingbeyond the expected behaviour. This study contributes to theunderstanding of NPs in post-Lisbon EU politics and enriches thediscourse on the parliamentary dimension of the EU Presidency,offering insights into the interplay between national legislativeaction and EU governance.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Contemporary European Studies

ISSN

1478-2804

e-ISSN

1478-2790

Svazek periodika

33

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

1474-1492

Kód UT WoS článku

001576134900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105022686208