Srovnání fyzikální typologie evropské Rámcové směrnice o vodách a modelů typu RIVPACS jako alternativních metod stanovení referenčních podmínek pro makrozoobentos

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F06%3A00018491" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/06:00018491 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00020711:_____/06:00000793

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A comparison of the European Water Framework Directive physical typology and RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions for benthic macroinvertebrates

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The EU Water Framework Directive requires European Union Member States to establish 'type-specific biological reference conditions' for streams and rivers. Types can be defined by using either a fixed typology (System-A), defined by ecoregions and categories of altitude, catchment area and geology, or by means of an alternative characterisation (System-B) that can use a variety of physical and chemical factors. Several European countries also have existing RIVPACS-type models that give site (rather thanstream type) specific predictions of benthic macroinvertebrate communities. In this paper we compare the Water Framework Directive (WFD) System-A physical typology and three existing European multivariate RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions. This work is carried out in Great Britain - using RIVPACS, Sweden - using SWEPAC(SRI) and the Czech Republic - using PERLA. We found that in all three countries, all seasons and season combinations, and fo

Název v anglickém jazyce

A comparison of the European Water Framework Directive physical typology and RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions for benthic macroinvertebrates

Popis výsledku anglicky

The EU Water Framework Directive requires European Union Member States to establish 'type-specific biological reference conditions' for streams and rivers. Types can be defined by using either a fixed typology (System-A), defined by ecoregions and categories of altitude, catchment area and geology, or by means of an alternative characterisation (System-B) that can use a variety of physical and chemical factors. Several European countries also have existing RIVPACS-type models that give site (rather thanstream type) specific predictions of benthic macroinvertebrate communities. In this paper we compare the Water Framework Directive (WFD) System-A physical typology and three existing European multivariate RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions. This work is carried out in Great Britain - using RIVPACS, Sweden - using SWEPAC(SRI) and the Czech Republic - using PERLA. We found that in all three countries, all seasons and season combinations, and fo

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DA - Hydrologie a limnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2006

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Hydrobiologia

ISSN

0018-8158

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Neuveden.

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

566

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

91-105

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—