Wind-stilling in the light of wind speed measurements: the Czech experience

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F18%3A00100756" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/18:00100756 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00020699:_____/17:N0000102 RIV/86652079:_____/18:00483909

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01492" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01492</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01492" target="_blank" >10.3354/cr01492</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Wind-stilling in the light of wind speed measurements: the Czech experience

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Changes of instruments often give rise to significant break-points in wind-speed series. This is particularly applicable to when measurements are automated, a process that started in the Czech Republic in the mid-1990s, when standard universal anemographs were progressively replaced by Vaisala WAA251 sensor (cup anemometer) and the WS425 sensor (ultrasonic). Parallel wind speed measurements, by universal anemographs and Vaisala sensors, at the Doksany (2000–2016) and Kocelovice (2000–2016) stations enabled differences in the two types of measurement to be analysed. Vaisala sensors measure, on average, higher wind-speeds than universal anemographs, particularly in calm situations and at low wind speeds. The differences between the two types of instrument do not depend on wind direction. Linear trends of homogenised daily mean wind-speed series from only a universal anemograph or combined from universal anemograph and Vaisala sensors generally exhibit no important differences in their significance or values. This could indicate that observed decreasing trends in mean daily wind-speeds (“stilling”) cannot be attributed to changes of wind-speed measurements to automated devices; with respect to only two stations being investigated, this is biased by high uncertainty. On the other hand, important differences in the two types of measurement, both in linear trends and their significance, appear for series of three daily readings (0700, 1400 and 2100 LMT).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Wind-stilling in the light of wind speed measurements: the Czech experience

Popis výsledku anglicky

Changes of instruments often give rise to significant break-points in wind-speed series. This is particularly applicable to when measurements are automated, a process that started in the Czech Republic in the mid-1990s, when standard universal anemographs were progressively replaced by Vaisala WAA251 sensor (cup anemometer) and the WS425 sensor (ultrasonic). Parallel wind speed measurements, by universal anemographs and Vaisala sensors, at the Doksany (2000–2016) and Kocelovice (2000–2016) stations enabled differences in the two types of measurement to be analysed. Vaisala sensors measure, on average, higher wind-speeds than universal anemographs, particularly in calm situations and at low wind speeds. The differences between the two types of instrument do not depend on wind direction. Linear trends of homogenised daily mean wind-speed series from only a universal anemograph or combined from universal anemograph and Vaisala sensors generally exhibit no important differences in their significance or values. This could indicate that observed decreasing trends in mean daily wind-speeds (“stilling”) cannot be attributed to changes of wind-speed measurements to automated devices; with respect to only two stations being investigated, this is biased by high uncertainty. On the other hand, important differences in the two types of measurement, both in linear trends and their significance, appear for series of three daily readings (0700, 1400 and 2100 LMT).

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10509 - Meteorology and atmospheric sciences

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Climate Research

ISSN

0936-577X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

74

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

131-143

Kód UT WoS článku

000418809900004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85040571877