Do parasite communities differ between invasive and native fish hosts? A case of monogeneans infecting the gills of Nile tilapia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F25%3A00143412" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/25:00143412 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Do parasite communities differ between invasive and native fish hosts? A case of monogeneans infecting the gills of Nile tilapia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A release from parasites is assumed to be a major factor to the success of invasive species. However, strong evidence for a lower parasite load in invasive species is sparse on a larger geographical scale. To test this hypothesis, we analysed the monogenean gill parasite communities of invasive and native Nile tilapia across the African continent. We find significantly lower parasite loads in invasive populations, but no difference in parasite richness between invasive and native populations. Additionally, significant differences in parasite load and richness within the native range were found. We analysed the parasite community composition with a permanova and found strong variation in parasite communities both among native and invasive Nile tilapia. About 16% of this variation could be explained by two significant explanatory variables: introduction status of the host (4%) and ichthyofaunal province (12%), meaning both introduction status and geographical location influence parasite community composition. Furthermore, significant indicator parasite species were found for introduction status, river basin and ichthyofaunal province. Overall, we illustrate the potential value of ectoparasites to inform about the native environment and introduction history of fish. Possibly, this type of forensic parasitology, easily performed on museum specimens, could be useful to help resolve enigmatic invasions.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Do parasite communities differ between invasive and native fish hosts? A case of monogeneans infecting the gills of Nile tilapia
Popis výsledku anglicky
A release from parasites is assumed to be a major factor to the success of invasive species. However, strong evidence for a lower parasite load in invasive species is sparse on a larger geographical scale. To test this hypothesis, we analysed the monogenean gill parasite communities of invasive and native Nile tilapia across the African continent. We find significantly lower parasite loads in invasive populations, but no difference in parasite richness between invasive and native populations. Additionally, significant differences in parasite load and richness within the native range were found. We analysed the parasite community composition with a permanova and found strong variation in parasite communities both among native and invasive Nile tilapia. About 16% of this variation could be explained by two significant explanatory variables: introduction status of the host (4%) and ichthyofaunal province (12%), meaning both introduction status and geographical location influence parasite community composition. Furthermore, significant indicator parasite species were found for introduction status, river basin and ichthyofaunal province. Overall, we illustrate the potential value of ectoparasites to inform about the native environment and introduction history of fish. Possibly, this type of forensic parasitology, easily performed on museum specimens, could be useful to help resolve enigmatic invasions.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
HYDROBIOLOGIA
ISSN
0018-8158
e-ISSN
1573-5117
Svazek periodika
852
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
15
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
3911-3928
Kód UT WoS článku
001395753300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85217412132