Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F19%3A00109059" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/19:00109059 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8802110" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8802110</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The Unified Modelling Language (UML) is being widely accepted as a standard modelling notation for visualizing software systems during design and development. UML has thus become part of many software engineering course curricula at universities worldwide, providing a recognized tool for practical training of students in understanding and visualizing software design. It is however common that students have difficulties in absorbing UML in its complexity, and often repeat the same mistakes that have been observed by course tutors in previous years. Having a catalogue of such mistakes could hence increase the effectiveness of both teaching and learning of UML diagrams. In this paper, we present such a catalogue, consisting of 146 types of mistakes in eight types of diagrams. As the main contribution of this study, we use this catalogue to guide the analysis of student projects within a software engineering course. In total, over 2,700 diagrams submitted over 12 weeks of a semester by 123 students were analysed to identify the frequency of mistakes (from the catalogue), correlations of the mistakes between different diagram types, correlation of the quality of student projects to exam results, student behaviour in terms of introducing and fixing the mistakes over time, and other interesting insights. The analysis is described together with its setup and execution, and all datasets and detailed guidebook to the catalogue of all mistakes is made available for download.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The Unified Modelling Language (UML) is being widely accepted as a standard modelling notation for visualizing software systems during design and development. UML has thus become part of many software engineering course curricula at universities worldwide, providing a recognized tool for practical training of students in understanding and visualizing software design. It is however common that students have difficulties in absorbing UML in its complexity, and often repeat the same mistakes that have been observed by course tutors in previous years. Having a catalogue of such mistakes could hence increase the effectiveness of both teaching and learning of UML diagrams. In this paper, we present such a catalogue, consisting of 146 types of mistakes in eight types of diagrams. As the main contribution of this study, we use this catalogue to guide the analysis of student projects within a software engineering course. In total, over 2,700 diagrams submitted over 12 weeks of a semester by 123 students were analysed to identify the frequency of mistakes (from the catalogue), correlations of the mistakes between different diagram types, correlation of the quality of student projects to exam results, student behaviour in terms of introducing and fixing the mistakes over time, and other interesting insights. The analysis is described together with its setup and execution, and all datasets and detailed guidebook to the catalogue of all mistakes is made available for download.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10200 - Computer and information sciences

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training

  • ISBN

    9781728110004

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    100-109

  • Název nakladatele

    IEEE Press

  • Místo vydání

    Piscataway, NJ, USA

  • Místo konání akce

    Montreal

  • Datum konání akce

    1. 1. 2019

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000570746000011