Some Notes on the Interface of Communicative Dynamism and Prosodic Prominence as Constituents of Auctorial Communicative Strategy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F10%3A00047786" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/10:00047786 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Some Notes on the Interface of Communicative Dynamism and Prosodic Prominence as Constituents of Auctorial Communicative Strategy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

With a few honourable exceptions (most recently Chamonikolasová 2007, 2009 and Headlandová Kalischová 2009a, 2009b), within the research in the field of the Firbasian theory of functional sentence perspective (FSP), the interplay of factors operating inspoken discourse seems to play a somewhat marginal role. It is its written counterpart that wins the scholars? attention most of the time. The present paper deals with a functional comparison of the distribution of the degrees of communicative dynamism (CD) and that of the degrees of prosodic prominence (PP) in spoken discourse, their interplay, and its possible (aesthetic) effects. The author discusses the results of his own investigation into the area of FSP based on an authentic short text sample. Research has shown (Firbas 1995, Svoboda 2006, Adam 2009, Hurtová 2009) that the author?s communicative purpose is typically related to the aesthetic function carried by the text.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Some Notes on the Interface of Communicative Dynamism and Prosodic Prominence as Constituents of Auctorial Communicative Strategy

Popis výsledku anglicky

With a few honourable exceptions (most recently Chamonikolasová 2007, 2009 and Headlandová Kalischová 2009a, 2009b), within the research in the field of the Firbasian theory of functional sentence perspective (FSP), the interplay of factors operating inspoken discourse seems to play a somewhat marginal role. It is its written counterpart that wins the scholars? attention most of the time. The present paper deals with a functional comparison of the distribution of the degrees of communicative dynamism (CD) and that of the degrees of prosodic prominence (PP) in spoken discourse, their interplay, and its possible (aesthetic) effects. The author discusses the results of his own investigation into the area of FSP based on an authentic short text sample. Research has shown (Firbas 1995, Svoboda 2006, Adam 2009, Hurtová 2009) that the author?s communicative purpose is typically related to the aesthetic function carried by the text.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AI - Jazykověda

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Discourse and Interaction

ISSN

1802-9930

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

3

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—