The Prague Linguistic Circle and Dialectics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F17%3A00100158" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/17:00100158 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-2426/9428" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-2426/9428</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Prague Linguistic Circle and Dialectics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study deals with dialectics in the context of the Prague Linguistic Circle, particularly in the context of Jan Mukařovský’s thinking. The essay presents 1) main sources of Mukařovský’s dialectics, and outlines 2) Mukařovský’s dialectical method. The notion of dialectics appears in Mukařovský’s scholarly work in a set of connections. He applied dialectics as a method, manner or form of rationality. It served as a means of gaining knowledge about the world, specific phenomena and objects, their essence, interconnectedness as well as development. Mukařovský also used it as a procedure for resolving contradictions (antinomies) that he encountered in his scientific explorations and in ordinary practical activities. He understood dialectical thinking as dynamic, open, and pluralist thinking striving to reflect reality as a constant process. Gradual coming together of dialectics and materialism, evident in Mukařovský’s scholarly works from mid-1930s, resulted, ten years later, in a public adoption of dialectical materialism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Prague Linguistic Circle and Dialectics

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study deals with dialectics in the context of the Prague Linguistic Circle, particularly in the context of Jan Mukařovský’s thinking. The essay presents 1) main sources of Mukařovský’s dialectics, and outlines 2) Mukařovský’s dialectical method. The notion of dialectics appears in Mukařovský’s scholarly work in a set of connections. He applied dialectics as a method, manner or form of rationality. It served as a means of gaining knowledge about the world, specific phenomena and objects, their essence, interconnectedness as well as development. Mukařovský also used it as a procedure for resolving contradictions (antinomies) that he encountered in his scientific explorations and in ordinary practical activities. He understood dialectical thinking as dynamic, open, and pluralist thinking striving to reflect reality as a constant process. Gradual coming together of dialectics and materialism, evident in Mukařovský’s scholarly works from mid-1930s, resulted, ten years later, in a public adoption of dialectical materialism.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60204 - General literature studies

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Enthymema

ISSN

2037-2426

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2017

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

19

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

352-357

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—