Professional vision in and on action: Two sides of the same coin?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F19%3A00107687" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/19:00107687 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Professional vision in and on action: Two sides of the same coin?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Professional vision, albeit a well-researched concept, has mostly been researched as professional vision on action, i.e. not in the act of actual teaching. Modern technologies, such as eye-tracking, allow us to explore also professional vision in action, i.e. when teachers actually teach (e.g. Cortina et al., 2015). This, however, bids the question how professional vision on action and in action differ. Our study aims to explore this using two methods of eye-tracking: we asked teachers to wear SMI 60 Hz eye-tracking glasses (ETG) during instruction. Later, sequences from a video tape of the same instruction (camera aimed at students) were replayed to the same teachers and their eye-movements were monitored (RED 250 mobile 250 Hz – remote ET). They were also asked to comment on the videos. Bearing in mind that these two viewpoints are very different, we opted for an in-depth analysis of the gaze replays from ETG and remote ET (concurrent viewing). This analysis takes into account the timeline of the video, the context, the events, and also the teacher’s comments.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Professional vision in and on action: Two sides of the same coin?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Professional vision, albeit a well-researched concept, has mostly been researched as professional vision on action, i.e. not in the act of actual teaching. Modern technologies, such as eye-tracking, allow us to explore also professional vision in action, i.e. when teachers actually teach (e.g. Cortina et al., 2015). This, however, bids the question how professional vision on action and in action differ. Our study aims to explore this using two methods of eye-tracking: we asked teachers to wear SMI 60 Hz eye-tracking glasses (ETG) during instruction. Later, sequences from a video tape of the same instruction (camera aimed at students) were replayed to the same teachers and their eye-movements were monitored (RED 250 mobile 250 Hz – remote ET). They were also asked to comment on the videos. Bearing in mind that these two viewpoints are very different, we opted for an in-depth analysis of the gaze replays from ETG and remote ET (concurrent viewing). This analysis takes into account the timeline of the video, the context, the events, and also the teacher’s comments.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-15467S" target="_blank" >GA17-15467S: Profesní vidění učitelů anglického jazyka v/po akci v komunikačních aktivitách perspektivou eye trackingu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů