In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14510%2F21%3A00129814" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14510/21:00129814 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601649/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601649/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04195-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00402-021-04195-2</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Introduction: The aim of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate clinical results and rotational stability at least 2 years after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block (BT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BTB). Materials and methods: In both groups (BT and BTB), 40 patients selected prospectively at random were evaluated. The mean follow-up after the surgery was 28 months (range 24-33 months). A navigation system was used to measure rotational stability of the knee joint. Cincinnati, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and visual analog score (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical results and the non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for the statistical analysis. Results: After the BT reconstruction, the mean internal rotation of the tibia (IR) was 9.5°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.6° at average. After the BTB reconstruction, the mean IR was 9.9°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.7° at average. We did not find any statistically significant difference in IR stability between BT and BTB reconstruction. In terms of clinical results, regarding the VAS, patients perceive significantly more pain after the BTB reconstruction (p < 0.05). Kneeling was reported more difficult and painful after BTB reconstruction. Conclusions: The BT reconstruction of the ACL provides similar clinical results, less pain, better flexion and the same rotational stability of the knee in comparison with the BTB reconstruction.
Název v anglickém jazyce
In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
Popis výsledku anglicky
Introduction: The aim of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate clinical results and rotational stability at least 2 years after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block (BT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BTB). Materials and methods: In both groups (BT and BTB), 40 patients selected prospectively at random were evaluated. The mean follow-up after the surgery was 28 months (range 24-33 months). A navigation system was used to measure rotational stability of the knee joint. Cincinnati, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and visual analog score (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical results and the non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for the statistical analysis. Results: After the BT reconstruction, the mean internal rotation of the tibia (IR) was 9.5°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.6° at average. After the BTB reconstruction, the mean IR was 9.9°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.7° at average. We did not find any statistically significant difference in IR stability between BT and BTB reconstruction. In terms of clinical results, regarding the VAS, patients perceive significantly more pain after the BTB reconstruction (p < 0.05). Kneeling was reported more difficult and painful after BTB reconstruction. Conclusions: The BT reconstruction of the ACL provides similar clinical results, less pain, better flexion and the same rotational stability of the knee in comparison with the BTB reconstruction.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
ISSN
0936-8051
e-ISSN
1434-3916
Svazek periodika
142
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
1995-1999
Kód UT WoS článku
000702973100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85116277189