Just War Theory: Feminist Critique as a Practical Alternative to Revisionism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F19%3A00111140" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/19:00111140 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PC2019?3?164" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PC2019?3?164</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PC2019-3-164" target="_blank" >10.5817/PC2019-3-164</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Just War Theory: Feminist Critique as a Practical Alternative to Revisionism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

For more than a decade now, a debate has taken place between revisionists and traditionalists about some of the constitutive aspects and the nature of the just war theory. This article argues that revisionism has not been able to provide a practical alternative to the traditional just war theory and that we can satisfy some of the main practical aims of revisionism even within the traditional just war theory framework. The article then briefly introduces the feminist critique of the just war tradition recently presented by Rosemary Kellison and argues that Kellison's approach promises a more appropriate practical reform programme for the just war debate. Moreover, the practical perspective of Kellison's account is able to contain some of the aims of revisionism without containing its shortcomings such as its counterintuitive conclusions or deflecting too far from the traditional just war theory.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Just War Theory: Feminist Critique as a Practical Alternative to Revisionism

Popis výsledku anglicky

For more than a decade now, a debate has taken place between revisionists and traditionalists about some of the constitutive aspects and the nature of the just war theory. This article argues that revisionism has not been able to provide a practical alternative to the traditional just war theory and that we can satisfy some of the main practical aims of revisionism even within the traditional just war theory framework. The article then briefly introduces the feminist critique of the just war tradition recently presented by Rosemary Kellison and argues that Kellison's approach promises a more appropriate practical reform programme for the just war debate. Moreover, the practical perspective of Kellison's account is able to contain some of the aims of revisionism without containing its shortcomings such as its counterintuitive conclusions or deflecting too far from the traditional just war theory.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Journal of Political Science

ISSN

1211-3247

e-ISSN

1805-9503

Svazek periodika

2019

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

164-180

Kód UT WoS článku

000511428100002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85078901747