Collaborative Governance Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemics: Czech Republic and Slovakia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F21%3A00118986" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/21:00118986 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://cepar.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/issue/view/73" target="_blank" >http://cepar.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/issue/view/73</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2021.1.04" target="_blank" >10.17573/cepar.2021.1.04</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Collaborative Governance Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemics: Czech Republic and Slovakia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The goal of this article is to evaluate what the Czech and Slovak governments have done to protect their countries and try to assess why they have achieved different results for the first and second waves of the Covid-19 pandemic. The basis for such evaluation is the concept of collaborative governance, while qualitative research methods are used to achieve this goal. Based on comprehensive case studies and following analysis,the article suggests that in countries with limited quality of collaborative governance and no experience in similar pandemics, short-term ultramobilisation” and positive results are indeed possible, but failures are non-avoidable in the long run. During the second wave of the pandemic, the weaknesses in governance resulted in massive governance failures. As a result, the governments’ responses delivered very limited results in terms of prevalence of Covid-19.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Collaborative Governance Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemics: Czech Republic and Slovakia

Popis výsledku anglicky

The goal of this article is to evaluate what the Czech and Slovak governments have done to protect their countries and try to assess why they have achieved different results for the first and second waves of the Covid-19 pandemic. The basis for such evaluation is the concept of collaborative governance, while qualitative research methods are used to achieve this goal. Based on comprehensive case studies and following analysis,the article suggests that in countries with limited quality of collaborative governance and no experience in similar pandemics, short-term ultramobilisation” and positive results are indeed possible, but failures are non-avoidable in the long run. During the second wave of the pandemic, the weaknesses in governance resulted in massive governance failures. As a result, the governments’ responses delivered very limited results in terms of prevalence of Covid-19.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50602 - Public administration

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-06020S" target="_blank" >GA19-06020S: Alternativní způsoby poskytování služeb</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Public Administration Review

ISSN

2591-2240

e-ISSN

2591-2259

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SI - Slovinská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

85-106

Kód UT WoS článku

000657321400004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85124432197