Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14640%2F12%3A00064694" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14640/12:00064694 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The purpose of the paper is to look at conversation management of interviewers - members of the Parliamentary Committee and strategies used by witnesses, who were assumed to have some awareness of bad practices and thus possibly breaching the law. The PEACE method of interviewing was adopted; interviewers seemed to be aware of the Code of Practice used in England and Wales, which defines the interview as "the questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences"(Home Office 2008:37). Although the people invited for the interview to give evidence were called witnesses, there was a suspicion that they might have had some awareness of improper practices, which is illustrated in the linguistic analysis. Transcripts of highly formal televised interrogation were used to analyse strategies of individual speakers. The analysis did not work with recordings so no implications were made regarding phonological analysis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The purpose of the paper is to look at conversation management of interviewers - members of the Parliamentary Committee and strategies used by witnesses, who were assumed to have some awareness of bad practices and thus possibly breaching the law. The PEACE method of interviewing was adopted; interviewers seemed to be aware of the Code of Practice used in England and Wales, which defines the interview as "the questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences"(Home Office 2008:37). Although the people invited for the interview to give evidence were called witnesses, there was a suspicion that they might have had some awareness of improper practices, which is illustrated in the linguistic analysis. Transcripts of highly formal televised interrogation were used to analyse strategies of individual speakers. The analysis did not work with recordings so no implications were made regarding phonological analysis.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AI - Jazykověda

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů