Remote ischaemic preconditioning in coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14740%2F12%3A00062187" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14740/12:00062187 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00209775:_____/12:#0000235

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://heart.bmj.com/content/98/17/1267" target="_blank" >http://heart.bmj.com/content/98/17/1267</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301551" target="_blank" >10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301551</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Remote ischaemic preconditioning in coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim Randomised trials exploring remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have yielded conflicting data regarding potential cardiovascular and renal protection, and are individually flawedby small sample size. Methods Three investigators independently searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify randomised trials testing RIPC in patients undergoing CABG. Results Nine studies with 704 patients were included. Standardisedmean difference of troponin I and T release showed a significant decrease (-0.36 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.09)). This difference held true after excluding the trials with cross-clamp fibrillation, the study with off-pump CABG and studies using a flurane as anaesthetic agent (-0.41 (95% CI -0.69 to -0.12), -0.38 (95% CI -0.70 to -0.07) and -0.37 (95% CI -0.63 to -0.12), respectively). A similar trend was also obtained for patients with multivessel disease (-0.41 (95% CI -0.73 to -0.08)).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Remote ischaemic preconditioning in coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim Randomised trials exploring remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have yielded conflicting data regarding potential cardiovascular and renal protection, and are individually flawedby small sample size. Methods Three investigators independently searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify randomised trials testing RIPC in patients undergoing CABG. Results Nine studies with 704 patients were included. Standardisedmean difference of troponin I and T release showed a significant decrease (-0.36 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.09)). This difference held true after excluding the trials with cross-clamp fibrillation, the study with off-pump CABG and studies using a flurane as anaesthetic agent (-0.41 (95% CI -0.69 to -0.12), -0.38 (95% CI -0.70 to -0.07) and -0.37 (95% CI -0.63 to -0.12), respectively). A similar trend was also obtained for patients with multivessel disease (-0.41 (95% CI -0.73 to -0.08)).

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0068" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0068: CEITEC - central european institute of technology</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Heart

ISSN

1355-6037

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

98

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

17

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

1267-1271

Kód UT WoS článku

000307565800004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—