Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Are Migraine With and Without Aura Really Different Entities?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14740%2F19%3A00113374" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14740/19:00113374 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.00982/full" target="_blank" >https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.00982/full</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00982" target="_blank" >10.3389/fneur.2019.00982</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Are Migraine With and Without Aura Really Different Entities?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Migraine research is booming with the rapidly developing neuroimaging tools. Structural and functional alterations of the migrainous brain were detected with MRI. The outcome of a research study largely depends on the working hypothesis, on the chosen measurement approach and also on the subject selection. Against all evidence from the literature that migraine subtypes are different, most of the studies handle migraine with and without aura as one disease. Methods: Publications from PubMed database were searched for terms of "migraine with aura," "migraine without aura," "interictal," "MRI," "diffusion weighted MRI," "functional MRI," "compared to," "atrophy" alone and in combination. Conclusion: Only a few imaging studies compared the two subforms of the disease, migraine with aura, and without aura, directly. Functional imaging investigations largely agree that there is an increased activity/activation of the brain in migraine with aura as compared to migraine without aura. We propose that this might be the signature of cortical hyperexcitability. However, structural investigations are not equivocal. We propose that variable contribution of parallel, competing mechanisms of maladaptive plasticity and neurodegeneration might be the reason behind the variable results.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Are Migraine With and Without Aura Really Different Entities?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Migraine research is booming with the rapidly developing neuroimaging tools. Structural and functional alterations of the migrainous brain were detected with MRI. The outcome of a research study largely depends on the working hypothesis, on the chosen measurement approach and also on the subject selection. Against all evidence from the literature that migraine subtypes are different, most of the studies handle migraine with and without aura as one disease. Methods: Publications from PubMed database were searched for terms of "migraine with aura," "migraine without aura," "interictal," "MRI," "diffusion weighted MRI," "functional MRI," "compared to," "atrophy" alone and in combination. Conclusion: Only a few imaging studies compared the two subforms of the disease, migraine with aura, and without aura, directly. Functional imaging investigations largely agree that there is an increased activity/activation of the brain in migraine with aura as compared to migraine without aura. We propose that this might be the signature of cortical hyperexcitability. However, structural investigations are not equivocal. We propose that variable contribution of parallel, competing mechanisms of maladaptive plasticity and neurodegeneration might be the reason behind the variable results.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30210 - Clinical neurology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/LQ1601" target="_blank" >LQ1601: CEITEC 2020</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY

  • ISSN

    1664-2295

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    10

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    OCT

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

    1-6

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000497654700001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85073686582