Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

"Among the Onions and Carrots The "dissident" and the countersignature of post-totalitarianismy"

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F21%3A39919752" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/21:39919752 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/view/uuid:1eae9fc9-c973-496f-af5c-db3b57e797a4?article=uuid:2d8b17cb-5059-446b-ba6b-e7e7ef781842" target="_blank" >https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/view/uuid:1eae9fc9-c973-496f-af5c-db3b57e797a4?article=uuid:2d8b17cb-5059-446b-ba6b-e7e7ef781842</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46854/fc.2021.4s68" target="_blank" >10.46854/fc.2021.4s68</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    "Among the Onions and Carrots The "dissident" and the countersignature of post-totalitarianismy"

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    &quot;This paper explores the notion of &quot;&quot;power&quot;&quot; prevalent in Vaclav Havel&apos;s understanding of the post-totalitarian regime. With this notion of power, which is &quot;&quot;seeping&quot;&quot; in nature, rather than rooted solely in an individual agent&apos;s actions, the role of the individual in the formation of the political &quot;&quot;we&quot;&quot; becomes a central issue. The starting point is Havel&apos;s well-known example of &quot;&quot;the greengrocer,&quot;&quot; that illustrate how Havel pictures the way out of the post-totalitarian regime as one in which individuals move from living a lie to living in truth. I show how Havel&apos;s talk about truth and authenticity, and his emphasis on a life in truth (which may appear judgemental, naive and cliche-like) is best understood. The wrong way to understand this is simply to say that people who merely obeyed that government, as the greengrocer did, are to be held accountable because they did not put up a fight against their oppressor. Such an understanding goes wrong because it fails to take into account the complexity of the relationship between power and language. In contrast to this, I argue that the central issue here is not that particular agents are to be held responsible for countersigning messages that they think are false. More precisely, I argue that the moral difficulty here is that the greengrocer&apos;s deeds, which appear as countersignatures of the regime, are possible because the messages conveyed are &quot;&quot;innocent&quot;&quot; on the surface, in a &quot;&quot;literal&quot;&quot; sense. The moral dimension of the greengrocer&apos;s actions, aiming to shed light on the complex relation between the government and the individual, is revealed as located in a field of tension between inherited sense and new projections. This, in turn, can help us to see the real nature of the transition Havel&apos;s grocer undergoes when he moves from living a lie to living in truth. It is not a matter of negating a false statement or utterance, nor of replacing it with a true one. It is a matter of realising that the responsibility for meaning is, ultimately, ours - and that the way in which he, the grocer, is one of us is something that has to be earned.&quot;

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    "Among the Onions and Carrots The "dissident" and the countersignature of post-totalitarianismy"

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    &quot;This paper explores the notion of &quot;&quot;power&quot;&quot; prevalent in Vaclav Havel&apos;s understanding of the post-totalitarian regime. With this notion of power, which is &quot;&quot;seeping&quot;&quot; in nature, rather than rooted solely in an individual agent&apos;s actions, the role of the individual in the formation of the political &quot;&quot;we&quot;&quot; becomes a central issue. The starting point is Havel&apos;s well-known example of &quot;&quot;the greengrocer,&quot;&quot; that illustrate how Havel pictures the way out of the post-totalitarian regime as one in which individuals move from living a lie to living in truth. I show how Havel&apos;s talk about truth and authenticity, and his emphasis on a life in truth (which may appear judgemental, naive and cliche-like) is best understood. The wrong way to understand this is simply to say that people who merely obeyed that government, as the greengrocer did, are to be held accountable because they did not put up a fight against their oppressor. Such an understanding goes wrong because it fails to take into account the complexity of the relationship between power and language. In contrast to this, I argue that the central issue here is not that particular agents are to be held responsible for countersigning messages that they think are false. More precisely, I argue that the moral difficulty here is that the greengrocer&apos;s deeds, which appear as countersignatures of the regime, are possible because the messages conveyed are &quot;&quot;innocent&quot;&quot; on the surface, in a &quot;&quot;literal&quot;&quot; sense. The moral dimension of the greengrocer&apos;s actions, aiming to shed light on the complex relation between the government and the individual, is revealed as located in a field of tension between inherited sense and new projections. This, in turn, can help us to see the real nature of the transition Havel&apos;s grocer undergoes when he moves from living a lie to living in truth. It is not a matter of negating a false statement or utterance, nor of replacing it with a true one. It is a matter of realising that the responsibility for meaning is, ultimately, ours - and that the way in which he, the grocer, is one of us is something that has to be earned.&quot;

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centrum pro etiku</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Filosofický časopis

  • ISSN

    0015-1831

  • e-ISSN

    2570-9232

  • Svazek periodika

    70

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    68-82

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000773983900005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85127688375