The Other Animal: Levinas at the Juncture of 'Rights' and 'Welfare'
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F23%3A39920534" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/23:39920534 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_32/reyes_june2023.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_32/reyes_june2023.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.25138/17.1.a3" target="_blank" >10.25138/17.1.a3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Other Animal: Levinas at the Juncture of 'Rights' and 'Welfare'
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
There is a growing number of Levinasian scholars who are interested in examining if Levinas's ethics could also be applied to problems in animal ethics, discerning in what ways it could contribute to this discourse. This article aims to define how Levinas would lodge himself between the two popular movements in normative animal ethics: animal rights and animal welfare in view of defining the contribution of the Levinasian framework of ethics of otherness when applied to the nonhuman (nh) animal. I proceed in three parts: discuss three case problems in animal ethics and define how the animal rightists and welfarists would pose their ethical questions on them; criticize the difference of the value principles of rightists and welfarists from the point of view of Levinas's idea of otherness of the nh animal; and identify the uniqueness of Levinas's ethical stance and mark down what domains of research would support him. My conclusion is that Levinas would be ineffectual in answering directly the practical problems for conflictual situations in normative animal ethics, but he could point out the a priori meaning of ethics that should subtend normative animal ethics.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Other Animal: Levinas at the Juncture of 'Rights' and 'Welfare'
Popis výsledku anglicky
There is a growing number of Levinasian scholars who are interested in examining if Levinas's ethics could also be applied to problems in animal ethics, discerning in what ways it could contribute to this discourse. This article aims to define how Levinas would lodge himself between the two popular movements in normative animal ethics: animal rights and animal welfare in view of defining the contribution of the Levinasian framework of ethics of otherness when applied to the nonhuman (nh) animal. I proceed in three parts: discuss three case problems in animal ethics and define how the animal rightists and welfarists would pose their ethical questions on them; criticize the difference of the value principles of rightists and welfarists from the point of view of Levinas's idea of otherness of the nh animal; and identify the uniqueness of Levinas's ethical stance and mark down what domains of research would support him. My conclusion is that Levinas would be ineffectual in answering directly the practical problems for conflictual situations in normative animal ethics, but he could point out the a priori meaning of ethics that should subtend normative animal ethics.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Kritike
ISSN
1908-7330
e-ISSN
1908-7330
Svazek periodika
17
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
PH - Filipínská republika
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
58-76
Kód UT WoS článku
001024395900004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—