“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F25%3A39923969" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/25:39923969 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2633002425I385562" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/2633002425I385562</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633002425I385562" target="_blank" >10.1177/2633002425I385562</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The radical right in late-imperial Russia arose during the 1905 Revolution. The far-right professed the conservative state ideology “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality”; it was against parliamentarianism, liberalism, and socialism. Although rooted in conservative thought, the far right was radical in its populism, antisemitism and quest for mass appeal. The far-right parties sought to defend the existing order and resorted to violence, which they legitimised as self-defence against revolutionaries. After the 1917 revolution, various far-right figures went into exile and continued the struggle against the Bolshevik regime. This time, violence was legitimised as righteous revenge against the usurpers of the Russian homeland. The article deals with how the far right legitimised political violence. It points to the continuity in the use of violence, which was also related to the continuity of antisemitism. At the same time, however, it draws attention to shifts in the legitimisation of violence.

Název v anglickém jazyce

“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

Popis výsledku anglicky

The radical right in late-imperial Russia arose during the 1905 Revolution. The far-right professed the conservative state ideology “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality”; it was against parliamentarianism, liberalism, and socialism. Although rooted in conservative thought, the far right was radical in its populism, antisemitism and quest for mass appeal. The far-right parties sought to defend the existing order and resorted to violence, which they legitimised as self-defence against revolutionaries. After the 1917 revolution, various far-right figures went into exile and continued the struggle against the Bolshevik regime. This time, violence was legitimised as righteous revenge against the usurpers of the Russian homeland. The article deals with how the far right legitimised political violence. It points to the continuity in the use of violence, which was also related to the continuity of antisemitism. At the same time, however, it draws attention to shifts in the legitimisation of violence.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-09721S" target="_blank" >GA20-09721S: Ruská radikální pravice v emigraci, 1918-1945</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Violence: an international journal

ISSN

2633-0024

e-ISSN

2633-0032

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

141-167

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—