Comparison of Solid-Phase and Single-Drop Microextractions for Headspace Analysis of Herbal Essential Oils

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25310%2F09%3A00008398" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25310/09:00008398 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Solid-Phase and Single-Drop Microextractions for Headspace Analysis of Herbal Essential Oils

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The analytical microextraction methods of gas chromatography coupled with flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) for determination of selected essential oils in herbs were proposed. Two microextraction methods for the isolation of essential oils from plantssuch as Lavandula spica L., Melissa officinalis L., Mentha piperita L. and Salvia officinalis L. were used. The methods of solid-phase and single-drop microextractions, were optimised and compared. The obtained LOD values for all studied essential oils were found to be within 2.5?20.5 ?g for SDME and 57.0-139.8 ?g for SPME method per 100 g of dried sample leaves. The appropriate LOQ values were then 8.4-68.4 ?g for SDME and 189.8-466.1 ?g for SPME of target analytes per 100 g of dried sample leaves.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Solid-Phase and Single-Drop Microextractions for Headspace Analysis of Herbal Essential Oils

Popis výsledku anglicky

The analytical microextraction methods of gas chromatography coupled with flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) for determination of selected essential oils in herbs were proposed. Two microextraction methods for the isolation of essential oils from plantssuch as Lavandula spica L., Melissa officinalis L., Mentha piperita L. and Salvia officinalis L. were used. The methods of solid-phase and single-drop microextractions, were optimised and compared. The obtained LOD values for all studied essential oils were found to be within 2.5?20.5 ?g for SDME and 57.0-139.8 ?g for SPME method per 100 g of dried sample leaves. The appropriate LOQ values were then 8.4-68.4 ?g for SDME and 189.8-466.1 ?g for SPME of target analytes per 100 g of dried sample leaves.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

CB - Analytická chemie, separace

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA203%2F08%2F1536" target="_blank" >GA203/08/1536: Progresívní metody v chemické, potravinářské a klinické analýze</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2009

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Journal of Chemistry

ISSN

1895-1066

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—