Law on Prevention of Major Accidents Versus Real Prevention of Major Accidents

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25310%2F16%3A39901785" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25310/16:39901785 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Law on Prevention of Major Accidents Versus Real Prevention of Major Accidents

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The main concept standing in the background of the law on prevention of major accidents states that the fundamental tool capable to prevent major accidents is risk assessment which is widely exploited in the safety management system. Risk assessment influences elements of safety management system and is influenced by them. The authors summarize results of root cause analysis of eight major accidents from companies to which the law was applied. It is shown that failures represent either the absence of risk assessment or missing connections between the risk assessment and elements of safety management system. All the examples show that the real prevention of major accidents was substantially different from the cited main concept. The concept was not accepted/implemented within the companies although the law was seemingly implemented. Possible reasons of such a situation are identified. Set of recommendations results from the experience.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Law on Prevention of Major Accidents Versus Real Prevention of Major Accidents

Popis výsledku anglicky

The main concept standing in the background of the law on prevention of major accidents states that the fundamental tool capable to prevent major accidents is risk assessment which is widely exploited in the safety management system. Risk assessment influences elements of safety management system and is influenced by them. The authors summarize results of root cause analysis of eight major accidents from companies to which the law was applied. It is shown that failures represent either the absence of risk assessment or missing connections between the risk assessment and elements of safety management system. All the examples show that the real prevention of major accidents was substantially different from the cited main concept. The concept was not accepted/implemented within the companies although the law was seemingly implemented. Possible reasons of such a situation are identified. Set of recommendations results from the experience.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AQ - Bezpečnost a ochrana zdraví, člověk – stroj

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Technology

ISBN

978-80-86238-94-4

ISSN

2336-811X

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

539-544

Název nakladatele

Česká společnost průmyslové chemie

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Mikulov

Datum konání akce

25. 4. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—