Sustainable Development of Selected EU Countries in Age of Globalisation – A Case Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F17%3A39911541" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/17:39911541 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://globalization.uniza.sk/minule-zborniky/" target="_blank" >https://globalization.uniza.sk/minule-zborniky/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sustainable Development of Selected EU Countries in Age of Globalisation – A Case Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Sustainable development has belonged to strategic priorities of all developed countries since the last century. Along with globalisation, a discussion has started whether globalisation and sustainable development are in opposite or not. Many various sustainable development indicators are recognized by The European Council. They are grouped in ten headline indicators (SDI 1-10). According to SDI 1-10 metrics, the European Council assesses sustainable development of each EU country. Developed EU countries are performing better in comparison with lower-income economies from the point of view of normalised sustainable development indicators. Four countries are selected for the case study evaluating their performance in sustainable development in age of globalisation. Sweden represents the group of the most successful countries in EU in sustainability building. On the other side, Poland represents developing EU countries with low values of indicators but with the highest benefit from the EU investments and funding. The Czech Republic and Estonia demonstrate middle developed countries within the EU. The selected countries have implement the EU-formulated sustainability development strategy in different ways with consideration of different country’s historical background, location within the EU, population, GDP, achievement in socio-economic development, sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, demographic changes, public health, climate change and energy, sustainable transport, natural resources, global partnership, and good governance. Data are analysed by various methods and some results are visualised by means of cartographic outputs.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sustainable Development of Selected EU Countries in Age of Globalisation – A Case Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Sustainable development has belonged to strategic priorities of all developed countries since the last century. Along with globalisation, a discussion has started whether globalisation and sustainable development are in opposite or not. Many various sustainable development indicators are recognized by The European Council. They are grouped in ten headline indicators (SDI 1-10). According to SDI 1-10 metrics, the European Council assesses sustainable development of each EU country. Developed EU countries are performing better in comparison with lower-income economies from the point of view of normalised sustainable development indicators. Four countries are selected for the case study evaluating their performance in sustainable development in age of globalisation. Sweden represents the group of the most successful countries in EU in sustainability building. On the other side, Poland represents developing EU countries with low values of indicators but with the highest benefit from the EU investments and funding. The Czech Republic and Estonia demonstrate middle developed countries within the EU. The selected countries have implement the EU-formulated sustainability development strategy in different ways with consideration of different country’s historical background, location within the EU, population, GDP, achievement in socio-economic development, sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, demographic changes, public health, climate change and energy, sustainable transport, natural resources, global partnership, and good governance. Data are analysed by various methods and some results are visualised by means of cartographic outputs.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Globalization and its socio-economic consequences : 17th International scientific conference : proceedings

ISBN

978-80-8154-212-1

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

1006-1013

Název nakladatele

Žilinská univerzita

Místo vydání

Žilina

Místo konání akce

Rajecké Teplice

Datum konání akce

4. 10. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000685059201064