COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM EVOLUTION AND ITS PERSPECTIVES
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F18%3A39913406" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/18:39913406 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM EVOLUTION AND ITS PERSPECTIVES
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A common legal framework for immigration and asylum policies in the EU has been formulated as well as common procedure for implementing them by Member States. However, Member States do not always adhere to the EU approach adopting and disposing of common procedure for implementing immigration and asylum policies. Member States seek their national interest first leading to possible incompatibilities of national legislations and administrative practices with EU immigration and asylum regulations even though they are guided by EU rules due to the principle of primacy of EU law. The article explains the evolution of Common European Asylum System, its insufficiencies, and the Commission’s proposal of new regulations seeking to augment the efficiency and capacity of the system to determine an asylum application effectively. It further analyzes the Emergency Relocation Scheme together with the ECJ decision dismissing the action of three Visegrad states seeking annulment of relevant Council’s decisions. It was discovered that despite the aim to tackle immigration issues CEAS needs to be improved with a corrective allocation mechanism for a fair sharing responsibility between Member States. It is therefore proposed to increase the current level of harmonization in the EU asylum legislation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM EVOLUTION AND ITS PERSPECTIVES
Popis výsledku anglicky
A common legal framework for immigration and asylum policies in the EU has been formulated as well as common procedure for implementing them by Member States. However, Member States do not always adhere to the EU approach adopting and disposing of common procedure for implementing immigration and asylum policies. Member States seek their national interest first leading to possible incompatibilities of national legislations and administrative practices with EU immigration and asylum regulations even though they are guided by EU rules due to the principle of primacy of EU law. The article explains the evolution of Common European Asylum System, its insufficiencies, and the Commission’s proposal of new regulations seeking to augment the efficiency and capacity of the system to determine an asylum application effectively. It further analyzes the Emergency Relocation Scheme together with the ECJ decision dismissing the action of three Visegrad states seeking annulment of relevant Council’s decisions. It was discovered that despite the aim to tackle immigration issues CEAS needs to be improved with a corrective allocation mechanism for a fair sharing responsibility between Member States. It is therefore proposed to increase the current level of harmonization in the EU asylum legislation.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
SGEM 2018 : conference proceedings. Vol. 5
ISBN
978-619-7408-67-6
ISSN
2367-5659
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
235-243
Název nakladatele
SGEM
Místo vydání
Sofia
Místo konání akce
Florencie
Datum konání akce
23. 10. 2018
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—