To free or not to free (ride): a comparative analysis of the NATO burden-sharing in the Czech Republic and Lithuania – another insight into the issues of military performance in the Central and Eastern Europe
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F21%3A39916212" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/21:39916212 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14751798.2021.1919345?src=" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14751798.2021.1919345?src=</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2021.1919345" target="_blank" >10.1080/14751798.2021.1919345</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
To free or not to free (ride): a comparative analysis of the NATO burden-sharing in the Czech Republic and Lithuania – another insight into the issues of military performance in the Central and Eastern Europe
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this paper we argue that free riding within NATO should be assessed from a microeconomic point of view rather than from a macroeconomic one. In particular, nations with a communist background should be appraised in a much broader perspective than the 2 percent GDP spending target, or number of soldiers on deployment. In comparison with post-Soviet countries such as Lithuania, wealthy post-communist country such as the Czech Republic where defence institution experienced an extensive militarisation of society and economy in the Soviet style, continues to fail in reducing their military-administrative complexes, as well as maintaining an excessive structure of militarised civilian activities. These can comprise, for example, sport clubs, folkloric choirs, medical and educational facilities, established in communism for purpose of military achieving autonomy from civil society. Hence, increasing defence spending to 2 percent of GDP can have the effect of strengthening this structure when weak defence institutions are not able to manage their entire defence budget to achieve military modernisation, as has happened in the Czech Republic.
Název v anglickém jazyce
To free or not to free (ride): a comparative analysis of the NATO burden-sharing in the Czech Republic and Lithuania – another insight into the issues of military performance in the Central and Eastern Europe
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this paper we argue that free riding within NATO should be assessed from a microeconomic point of view rather than from a macroeconomic one. In particular, nations with a communist background should be appraised in a much broader perspective than the 2 percent GDP spending target, or number of soldiers on deployment. In comparison with post-Soviet countries such as Lithuania, wealthy post-communist country such as the Czech Republic where defence institution experienced an extensive militarisation of society and economy in the Soviet style, continues to fail in reducing their military-administrative complexes, as well as maintaining an excessive structure of militarised civilian activities. These can comprise, for example, sport clubs, folkloric choirs, medical and educational facilities, established in communism for purpose of military achieving autonomy from civil society. Hence, increasing defence spending to 2 percent of GDP can have the effect of strengthening this structure when weak defence institutions are not able to manage their entire defence budget to achieve military modernisation, as has happened in the Czech Republic.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50206 - Finance
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Defense and Security Analysis
ISSN
1475-1798
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
37
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
164-176
Kód UT WoS článku
000650558500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85106230922