Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Comparative Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital dissemination Efficiency of Belgium And Sweden

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F21%3A39917377" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/21:39917377 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019" target="_blank" >10.34190/EKM.21.019</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Comparative Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital dissemination Efficiency of Belgium And Sweden

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Creating intellectual capital and a sustained competitive advantage is a key objective of most member states in the European Union. Multiple efforts have been put in place to harness the power of the internal inputs employed to achieve this, however, Belgium has consistently been lagging at the lower spectrum of intellectual capital generation among the European Union member states whilst Sweden currently stands as the one with the best innovative performance. Hence, using Panel data from the European Innovation Scoreboard (2011-2019) for Belgium and Sweden, this paper employed a two-stage DEA analysis (Hybrid Distance) to assess the efficiency of the use of financial injections in transforming into a sustained creation and dissemination of intellectual capital. Findings show that even though there has been steady improvement in efficiency in Belgium for past couple of years, the years of 2016-2018 were found to be relatively more efficient when compared to the preceding years. However, when the results were benchmarked against Sweden, the most innovative member state as of 2018, Belgium was still surprisingly found to be relatively efficient in the years of 2016-2018 prompting insightful learnings from between both countries. Recommendations were provided based on results of input redundancy and output deficiency computations as well as suitable policy implications to avert this gap.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Comparative Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital dissemination Efficiency of Belgium And Sweden

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Creating intellectual capital and a sustained competitive advantage is a key objective of most member states in the European Union. Multiple efforts have been put in place to harness the power of the internal inputs employed to achieve this, however, Belgium has consistently been lagging at the lower spectrum of intellectual capital generation among the European Union member states whilst Sweden currently stands as the one with the best innovative performance. Hence, using Panel data from the European Innovation Scoreboard (2011-2019) for Belgium and Sweden, this paper employed a two-stage DEA analysis (Hybrid Distance) to assess the efficiency of the use of financial injections in transforming into a sustained creation and dissemination of intellectual capital. Findings show that even though there has been steady improvement in efficiency in Belgium for past couple of years, the years of 2016-2018 were found to be relatively more efficient when compared to the preceding years. However, when the results were benchmarked against Sweden, the most innovative member state as of 2018, Belgium was still surprisingly found to be relatively efficient in the years of 2016-2018 prompting insightful learnings from between both countries. Recommendations were provided based on results of input redundancy and output deficiency computations as well as suitable policy implications to avert this gap.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Knowledge Management

  • ISBN

    978-1-914587-06-1

  • ISSN

    2048-8963

  • e-ISSN

    2048-8971

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    276-282

  • Název nakladatele

    Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited

  • Místo vydání

    Sonning Common

  • Místo konání akce

    ONLINE

  • Datum konání akce

    2. 9. 2021

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000758201900033