Do Environmental Regulations Stimulate Firms’ R&D, Product Innovation, or Environmental Awareness? Putting Porter’s Hypothesis in the Context of Central and Eastern European Countries
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F22%3A39919435" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/22:39919435 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-08313-6_10" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-08313-6_10</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08313-6_10" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-08313-6_10</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Do Environmental Regulations Stimulate Firms’ R&D, Product Innovation, or Environmental Awareness? Putting Porter’s Hypothesis in the Context of Central and Eastern European Countries
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter is based on analyzing Porter’s hypothesis stating that pollution could be seen as a kind of resource waste and that a firm’s reuse of this waste could lead to the firm’s competitive advantage, higher R&D, product innovation, and performance. However, countries in the Europe differ due to their historical legacy. Using data from the World Bank’s Enterprise Survey (2019), we put Porter’s hypothesis in the context of the “catching-up” countries of Central and Eastern Europe (the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). These countries differ significantly from their Western neighbors, especially in terms of lower innovation performance and environmental awareness. The results of our analyses confirm the importance of environmental regulations and their influence on firms’ R&D but also show them to be triggers for environmental awareness among firms. By contrast, we do not confirm the validity of the strong version of Porter’s hypothesis, which expects environmental regulations to impact the performance of firms in the countries studied. In addition, we point out an important role of firms’ R&D within product innovation processes. This chapter brings several contributions. From the theoretical point of view, we link theory regarding the validity of Porter’s hypothesis on the “catching-up literature” and on firms’ environmental awareness. From the practical perspective, we provide practical implications.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Do Environmental Regulations Stimulate Firms’ R&D, Product Innovation, or Environmental Awareness? Putting Porter’s Hypothesis in the Context of Central and Eastern European Countries
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter is based on analyzing Porter’s hypothesis stating that pollution could be seen as a kind of resource waste and that a firm’s reuse of this waste could lead to the firm’s competitive advantage, higher R&D, product innovation, and performance. However, countries in the Europe differ due to their historical legacy. Using data from the World Bank’s Enterprise Survey (2019), we put Porter’s hypothesis in the context of the “catching-up” countries of Central and Eastern Europe (the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). These countries differ significantly from their Western neighbors, especially in terms of lower innovation performance and environmental awareness. The results of our analyses confirm the importance of environmental regulations and their influence on firms’ R&D but also show them to be triggers for environmental awareness among firms. By contrast, we do not confirm the validity of the strong version of Porter’s hypothesis, which expects environmental regulations to impact the performance of firms in the countries studied. In addition, we point out an important role of firms’ R&D within product innovation processes. This chapter brings several contributions. From the theoretical point of view, we link theory regarding the validity of Porter’s hypothesis on the “catching-up literature” and on firms’ environmental awareness. From the practical perspective, we provide practical implications.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA20-03037S" target="_blank" >GA20-03037S: Návrh dynamického znalostního business modelu založeného na principech otevřených inovací</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Business Models for the Circular Economy : A European Perspective
ISBN
978-3-031-08312-9
Počet stran výsledku
29
Strana od-do
241-269
Počet stran knihy
269
Název nakladatele
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Místo vydání
Cham
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—