Ecological Comparison of Airships to Other Types of Transport
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25510%2F24%3A39922553" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25510/24:39922553 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202427p" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202427p</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31181/sems21202427p" target="_blank" >10.31181/sems21202427p</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Ecological Comparison of Airships to Other Types of Transport
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Airships are lighter-than-air vehicles that rely on buoyant gases like helium or hydrogen to generate lift, which is achieved through static buoyancy, unlike aircraft that use aerodynamic lifts. In comparison to traditional modes of transport, such as trucks, trains, and aircraft, airships have the potential to fill niche roles in freight logistics, particularly in regions with congested or underdeveloped infrastructure. In this study, a hybrid airship, named Dynalifter, is compared to traditional transport modes such as rail, electric trains, aircraft, and airships. Its large transport capacity over long distances, combined with its ability to land on smaller airfields, positions it as a complement to existing modes of transportation, particularly for oversized or remote cargo deliveries. It offers unique advantages in operational flexibility, reduced infrastructure requirements, and suitability for cargo transport. The analysis shows that although airship emissions are not the most environmentally friendly in terms of emissions per ton-kilometer, they offer significant flexibility in operational conditions and cargo capacity, making them a viable option for specific types of cargo. Further research into hydrogen propulsion and advances in airship technology could improve their environmental performance, potentially making them a competitive alternative for low-emission cargo transportation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Ecological Comparison of Airships to Other Types of Transport
Popis výsledku anglicky
Airships are lighter-than-air vehicles that rely on buoyant gases like helium or hydrogen to generate lift, which is achieved through static buoyancy, unlike aircraft that use aerodynamic lifts. In comparison to traditional modes of transport, such as trucks, trains, and aircraft, airships have the potential to fill niche roles in freight logistics, particularly in regions with congested or underdeveloped infrastructure. In this study, a hybrid airship, named Dynalifter, is compared to traditional transport modes such as rail, electric trains, aircraft, and airships. Its large transport capacity over long distances, combined with its ability to land on smaller airfields, positions it as a complement to existing modes of transportation, particularly for oversized or remote cargo deliveries. It offers unique advantages in operational flexibility, reduced infrastructure requirements, and suitability for cargo transport. The analysis shows that although airship emissions are not the most environmentally friendly in terms of emissions per ton-kilometer, they offer significant flexibility in operational conditions and cargo capacity, making them a viable option for specific types of cargo. Further research into hydrogen propulsion and advances in airship technology could improve their environmental performance, potentially making them a competitive alternative for low-emission cargo transportation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20104 - Transport engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences
ISSN
3009-3309
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
RS - Srbská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
223-233
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105028984028