Screening čichové funkce pomocí parfémovaných fixů.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25520%2F07%3A00005743" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25520/07:00005743 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Screening of olfactory function using odourized markers.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: The goal of our study was to create a psychophysical test for the screening of olfactory function on the basis of commercially available odorized markers (OM). There are six colored markers in one package filled with different odorants in suprathreshold levels. In order to identify the best approach, we investigated five different variations of the technique. Materials and methods: Olfaction was investigated in 189 subjects. Healthy participants as well as patients suffering from olfactory disorders were tested. Initially subjects were tested by one of five methods using OM. Finally, the ?Sniffin? Sticks? test (butanol odor threshold, odor identification) was performed. Results: Correlation of the OM screening test and the ?Sniffin? Sticks?ranged from 0.49 to 0.93 indicating that variations of the technique strongly influence the results of testing. The best technique for evaluating olfactory function included spontaneous naming of odors and odor identification from a list

Název v anglickém jazyce

Screening of olfactory function using odourized markers.

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: The goal of our study was to create a psychophysical test for the screening of olfactory function on the basis of commercially available odorized markers (OM). There are six colored markers in one package filled with different odorants in suprathreshold levels. In order to identify the best approach, we investigated five different variations of the technique. Materials and methods: Olfaction was investigated in 189 subjects. Healthy participants as well as patients suffering from olfactory disorders were tested. Initially subjects were tested by one of five methods using OM. Finally, the ?Sniffin? Sticks? test (butanol odor threshold, odor identification) was performed. Results: Correlation of the OM screening test and the ?Sniffin? Sticks?ranged from 0.49 to 0.93 indicating that variations of the technique strongly influence the results of testing. The best technique for evaluating olfactory function included spontaneous naming of odors and odor identification from a list

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/1A8667" target="_blank" >1A8667: Vyšetření čichu se zaměřením na pracující v chemickém provozu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2007

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Rhinology

ISSN

0300-0729

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

45

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

164-168

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—