Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in olfactory disorders: a COMET initiative
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25520%2F23%3A39921189" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25520/23:39921189 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.rhinologyjournal.com/Abstract.php?id=3082" target="_blank" >https://www.rhinologyjournal.com/Abstract.php?id=3082</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.116" target="_blank" >10.4193/Rhin22.116</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in olfactory disorders: a COMET initiative
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Statement of problem: Evaluating the effectiveness of the management of Olfactory Dysfunction (OD) has been limited by a paucity of high-quality randomised and/or controlled trials. A major barrier is heterogeneity of outcomes in such studies. Core outcome sets (COS) -standardized sets of outcomes that should be measured/reported as determined by consensus-would help overcome this problem and facilitate future meta-analyses and/or systematic reviews (SRs). We set out to develop a COS for interventions for patients with OD.Methods: A long-list of potential outcomes was identified by a steering group utilising a literature review, thematic analysis of a wide range of stakeholders'views and systematic analysis of currently available Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A subsequent e-Delphi process allowed patients and healthcare practitioners to individually rate the outcomes in terms of impor-tance on a 9-point Likert scale.Results: After 2 rounds of the iterative eDelphi process, the initial outcomes were distilled down to a final COS including sub-jective questions (visual analogue scores, quantitative and qualitative), quality of life measures, psychophysical testing of smell, baseline psychophysical testing of taste, and presence of side effects along with the investigational medicine/device and patient's symptom log.Conclusions: Inclusion of these core outcomes in future trials will increase the value of research on clinical interventions for OD.We include recommendations regarding the outcomes that should be measured, although future work will be required to further develop and revalidate existing outcome measures.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in olfactory disorders: a COMET initiative
Popis výsledku anglicky
Statement of problem: Evaluating the effectiveness of the management of Olfactory Dysfunction (OD) has been limited by a paucity of high-quality randomised and/or controlled trials. A major barrier is heterogeneity of outcomes in such studies. Core outcome sets (COS) -standardized sets of outcomes that should be measured/reported as determined by consensus-would help overcome this problem and facilitate future meta-analyses and/or systematic reviews (SRs). We set out to develop a COS for interventions for patients with OD.Methods: A long-list of potential outcomes was identified by a steering group utilising a literature review, thematic analysis of a wide range of stakeholders'views and systematic analysis of currently available Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A subsequent e-Delphi process allowed patients and healthcare practitioners to individually rate the outcomes in terms of impor-tance on a 9-point Likert scale.Results: After 2 rounds of the iterative eDelphi process, the initial outcomes were distilled down to a final COS including sub-jective questions (visual analogue scores, quantitative and qualitative), quality of life measures, psychophysical testing of smell, baseline psychophysical testing of taste, and presence of side effects along with the investigational medicine/device and patient's symptom log.Conclusions: Inclusion of these core outcomes in future trials will increase the value of research on clinical interventions for OD.We include recommendations regarding the outcomes that should be measured, although future work will be required to further develop and revalidate existing outcome measures.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30206 - Otorhinolaryngology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Rhinology
ISSN
0300-0729
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
61
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
312-319
Kód UT WoS článku
001045995500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85166383766