The lamprophyre problem: Return to the roots
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F11%3APU97427" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/11:PU97427 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The lamprophyre problem: Return to the roots
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The term lamprophyre has been introduced in 1874 by Gümbel for Variscan mafic post-collisional dykes from the Bohemian Massif characterized by phenocrysts of mafic mica embedded in a feldspar groundmass (minette and kersantite type). In analogy to these, Rosenbusch in 1887 added the amphibole-bearing types such as vogesite and camptonite, from which spessartite was subsequently distinguished. Unfortunately, during the 20th century, petrologists enlarged this ill-understood group by incorporating different rocks containing mafic phenocrysts, such as kimberlites, lamproites, nepheline-, leucite- and melilite-bearing rocks. This resulted in a single large supergroup of polygenetic rocks termed the lamprophyre clan. In contrast, recent understanding of lamprophyres provides a sound basis for rejecting such a variable group of polygenetic origin. As true lamprophyres, we can now recognize five original types (endmembers) among which there are continuous transitions: minette, kersantite, vogesite, spessartite and partly camptonite (in the original sense). It is important to note, that not every rock labelled as a true lamprophyre falls into this group. For example a peralkaline minette is not a lamprophyre but very probably corresponds to a lamproite. Since the term camptonite is usually used for an alkaline lamprophyre variety (in fact volatile-rich basalt), I recommend not to use it in context with the true lamprophyres. Lamprophyre varieties containing kaersutitic amphibole can be easily described as titanospessartite or titanovogesite, respectively. Moreover, the last proposed variety fills the gap in the current nomenclature.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The lamprophyre problem: Return to the roots
Popis výsledku anglicky
The term lamprophyre has been introduced in 1874 by Gümbel for Variscan mafic post-collisional dykes from the Bohemian Massif characterized by phenocrysts of mafic mica embedded in a feldspar groundmass (minette and kersantite type). In analogy to these, Rosenbusch in 1887 added the amphibole-bearing types such as vogesite and camptonite, from which spessartite was subsequently distinguished. Unfortunately, during the 20th century, petrologists enlarged this ill-understood group by incorporating different rocks containing mafic phenocrysts, such as kimberlites, lamproites, nepheline-, leucite- and melilite-bearing rocks. This resulted in a single large supergroup of polygenetic rocks termed the lamprophyre clan. In contrast, recent understanding of lamprophyres provides a sound basis for rejecting such a variable group of polygenetic origin. As true lamprophyres, we can now recognize five original types (endmembers) among which there are continuous transitions: minette, kersantite, vogesite, spessartite and partly camptonite (in the original sense). It is important to note, that not every rock labelled as a true lamprophyre falls into this group. For example a peralkaline minette is not a lamprophyre but very probably corresponds to a lamproite. Since the term camptonite is usually used for an alkaline lamprophyre variety (in fact volatile-rich basalt), I recommend not to use it in context with the true lamprophyres. Lamprophyre varieties containing kaersutitic amphibole can be easily described as titanospessartite or titanovogesite, respectively. Moreover, the last proposed variety fills the gap in the current nomenclature.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
DB - Geologie a mineralogie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts
ISBN
978-1-86239-207-6
ISSN
0026-461X
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
1
Strana od-do
1241-1241
Název nakladatele
Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Místo vydání
Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Ir
Místo konání akce
Zlatibor
Datum konání akce
14. 8. 2011
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—