Comparison of infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo for detecting delaminations in concrete bridges

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F19%3APU133115" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/19:PU133115 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/44994575:_____/19:N0000077

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950061819319944" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950061819319944</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.320" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.320</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo for detecting delaminations in concrete bridges

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A key means of locating hidden defects are non-destructive testing methods. This paper describes measurements that compare three non-destructive methods applied to a concrete bridge and a laboratory specimen with artificial defects to simulate cavities. Three methods (infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo) were used to measure the depth and size of cavities in the concrete panel. Furthermore, the measurements were made using two different brands of radar and two different thermal imaging cameras from the same manufacturer. Lastly, the NDT methods were compared across general performance criteria in terms of accuracy, testing practicality, and costs.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo for detecting delaminations in concrete bridges

Popis výsledku anglicky

A key means of locating hidden defects are non-destructive testing methods. This paper describes measurements that compare three non-destructive methods applied to a concrete bridge and a laboratory specimen with artificial defects to simulate cavities. Three methods (infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic pulse echo) were used to measure the depth and size of cavities in the concrete panel. Furthermore, the measurements were made using two different brands of radar and two different thermal imaging cameras from the same manufacturer. Lastly, the NDT methods were compared across general performance criteria in terms of accuracy, testing practicality, and costs.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS

ISSN

0950-0618

e-ISSN

1879-0526

Svazek periodika

neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

225

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

1098-1111

Kód UT WoS článku

000488305700093

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85070235443