Light pipe comparative study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F19%3APU136119" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/19:PU136119 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/sspjce/14/1/article-p17.xml" target="_blank" >https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/sspjce/14/1/article-p17.xml</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2019-0002" target="_blank" >10.1515/sspjce-2019-0002</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Light pipe comparative study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Results of daylight illuminance measurements of the field testing of two light guides with different roof installations is presented in the article. The first one is a common tubular system with a glass roof dome and the second one is a new light guide prototype with a concentrator head. The daylight illuminance was measured in a test chamber with the light guides installation. The measurements were carried out at the end of a summer season from August to September 2017. The measured data show differences in the daylight illuminance of the two tested light guides. The measured data were compared with simulation outputs in software Holigilm. In summary, it was found that the common light guide is about 37 percentage more efficient in light transmittance compared to the new light guide prototype. In temperate climate with dominant cloudy and partly cloudy daylight conditions the common light guide transmitted more light that the device with the concentrator head which reduced light transmission much more.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Light pipe comparative study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Results of daylight illuminance measurements of the field testing of two light guides with different roof installations is presented in the article. The first one is a common tubular system with a glass roof dome and the second one is a new light guide prototype with a concentrator head. The daylight illuminance was measured in a test chamber with the light guides installation. The measurements were carried out at the end of a summer season from August to September 2017. The measured data show differences in the daylight illuminance of the two tested light guides. The measured data were compared with simulation outputs in software Holigilm. In summary, it was found that the common light guide is about 37 percentage more efficient in light transmittance compared to the new light guide prototype. In temperate climate with dominant cloudy and partly cloudy daylight conditions the common light guide transmitted more light that the device with the concentrator head which reduced light transmission much more.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20103 - Architecture engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1408" target="_blank" >LO1408: AdMaS UP - Pokročilé stavební materiály, konstrukce a technologie</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Selected Scientific Papers - Journal of Civil Engineering (electronic)
ISSN
1338-7278
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
17-26
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—