Reliability comparison of two-point and four-point bending tests for coarse aggregate mixtures
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F24%3APU154940" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/24:PU154940 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5592/CO/cetra.2024.1638" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5592/CO/cetra.2024.1638</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5592/CO/cetra.2024.1638" target="_blank" >10.5592/CO/cetra.2024.1638</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Reliability comparison of two-point and four-point bending tests for coarse aggregate mixtures
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper investigates the reliability and comparative performance of two European standardized methods for assessing the stiffness and fatigue characteristics of asphalt mixtures with coarse aggregates up to 32 mm in grain size. European standards currently prescribe many various approaches to testing fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures, mainly two distinct methodologies: the two point bending test and the four point bending test. Despite the availability of both methods, certain laboratories predominantly prefer the two point bending test. The study focuses on a comprehensive set of tests conducted on asphalt mixtures containing coarse aggregates with a maximum grain size of 32 mm, applying both the two point and four point bending tests. The primary objective is to assess the reliability of these methods, particularly in the context of larger aggregate sizes. A crucial consideration arises from the fact that the two point bending test uses smaller specimens, potentially leading to an increased likelihood of test specimen failure in coarse aggregate asphalt mixtures. The experimental approach involves subjecting asphalt specimens to fatigue loading using both testing methods, systematically analysing the resulting data, and comparing the stiffness and fatigue performance outcomes. The findings contribute valuable insights into the appropriateness and reliability of the chosen testing methodologies, aiding practitioners and researchers in making informed decisions regarding the selection of fatigue testing protocols for asphalt mixtures with coarse aggregates.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Reliability comparison of two-point and four-point bending tests for coarse aggregate mixtures
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper investigates the reliability and comparative performance of two European standardized methods for assessing the stiffness and fatigue characteristics of asphalt mixtures with coarse aggregates up to 32 mm in grain size. European standards currently prescribe many various approaches to testing fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures, mainly two distinct methodologies: the two point bending test and the four point bending test. Despite the availability of both methods, certain laboratories predominantly prefer the two point bending test. The study focuses on a comprehensive set of tests conducted on asphalt mixtures containing coarse aggregates with a maximum grain size of 32 mm, applying both the two point and four point bending tests. The primary objective is to assess the reliability of these methods, particularly in the context of larger aggregate sizes. A crucial consideration arises from the fact that the two point bending test uses smaller specimens, potentially leading to an increased likelihood of test specimen failure in coarse aggregate asphalt mixtures. The experimental approach involves subjecting asphalt specimens to fatigue loading using both testing methods, systematically analysing the resulting data, and comparing the stiffness and fatigue performance outcomes. The findings contribute valuable insights into the appropriateness and reliability of the chosen testing methodologies, aiding practitioners and researchers in making informed decisions regarding the selection of fatigue testing protocols for asphalt mixtures with coarse aggregates.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20101 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Road and Rail Infrastructure VIII, Proceedings of the Conference CETRA 2024
ISBN
—
ISSN
1848-9850
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
595-602
Název nakladatele
Neuveden
Místo vydání
Croatia, Zagreb
Místo konání akce
Dubrovnik
Datum konání akce
15. 5. 2024
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—