ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F04%3APU47311" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/04:PU47311 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The present paper deals with practical applicability of four-point bending in determination of elasticity moduli. In [1] and [2], a theory was derived for evaluation of elasticity moduli by four point bending, namely for materials showing different moduli in tension and in compression, and for thin layers (e.g. plasmatic coatings), respectively. The limitations for reasonable exploitation of this method lie in the inaccuracy of results. As it can be expected, and as it was already mentioned in [2], theinfluence of input quantities inaccuracy on the results error can be very substantial. This is, in particular, the case of thin layers; since the measured plasmatic layer represents a small part of the specimen cross - section (usually less than 10%), the influence of the layer parameters (modulus of elasticity, thickness) on the resulting strain is relatively low. In an inverse problem, consequently, small changes in measured strains or thickness can result in large deviations in the de
Název v anglickém jazyce
ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
Popis výsledku anglicky
The present paper deals with practical applicability of four-point bending in determination of elasticity moduli. In [1] and [2], a theory was derived for evaluation of elasticity moduli by four point bending, namely for materials showing different moduli in tension and in compression, and for thin layers (e.g. plasmatic coatings), respectively. The limitations for reasonable exploitation of this method lie in the inaccuracy of results. As it can be expected, and as it was already mentioned in [2], theinfluence of input quantities inaccuracy on the results error can be very substantial. This is, in particular, the case of thin layers; since the measured plasmatic layer represents a small part of the specimen cross - section (usually less than 10%), the influence of the layer parameters (modulus of elasticity, thickness) on the resulting strain is relatively low. In an inverse problem, consequently, small changes in measured strains or thickness can result in large deviations in the de
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
BM - Fyzika pevných látek a magnetismus
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2004
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Inženýrská mechanika - Engineering Mechanics
ISSN
1210-2717
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
11
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
1-12
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—