Characteristics of Science and Scientific Activities: Considerations about What Is and What Is Not Scientific

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F12%3APU100494" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/12:PU100494 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Characteristics of Science and Scientific Activities: Considerations about What Is and What Is Not Scientific

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper deals with non-traditional but highly needed issues: to formulate criteria of a scientific activity. It is really unbelievable that in the period of information and scientific society such criteria do not exist and there are no fixed rules forassessment of scientific activities. However, in many fields of science, e.g., in reviews of scientific works or papers, reviewers are asked to assess whether or not the submitted work or text is scientific. Naturally, this decision is not objective evenif done by leading scientific individuals. Scientists may possess rather different individual criteria, and especially in doctoral studies, but not only there, it is desirable to make the review more objective. A doctoral thesis should be accepted onlyin case it brings some scientific achievement. Keeping in mind how difficult it can be to formalize and evaluate science, the authors try to propose attributes of scientific activities and to formulate some basic recommendations how to as

Název v anglickém jazyce

Characteristics of Science and Scientific Activities: Considerations about What Is and What Is Not Scientific

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper deals with non-traditional but highly needed issues: to formulate criteria of a scientific activity. It is really unbelievable that in the period of information and scientific society such criteria do not exist and there are no fixed rules forassessment of scientific activities. However, in many fields of science, e.g., in reviews of scientific works or papers, reviewers are asked to assess whether or not the submitted work or text is scientific. Naturally, this decision is not objective evenif done by leading scientific individuals. Scientists may possess rather different individual criteria, and especially in doctoral studies, but not only there, it is desirable to make the review more objective. A doctoral thesis should be accepted onlyin case it brings some scientific achievement. Keeping in mind how difficult it can be to formalize and evaluate science, the authors try to propose attributes of scientific activities and to formulate some basic recommendations how to as

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.09.0228" target="_blank" >EE2.3.09.0228: Komplexní systém pro získávání, vzdělávání a trvalé zapojování talentů do výzkumných a vývojových center AV ČR a FSI VUT v Brně</a><br>

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation

ISSN

2159-5275

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

573-583

Kód UT WoS článku

000313492700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—