Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Treatment of Non-Recyclable Municipal Waste
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F18%3APU127388" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/18:PU127388 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-018-1761-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-018-1761-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1761-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11705-018-1761-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Treatment of Non-Recyclable Municipal Waste
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper thoroughly analyses factors affecting production of greenhouse gases from waste treatment of residual municipal waste. The analysis is conducted so that the environmentally-friendly decision making criteria may be later implemented into an optimization task, which allocates waste treatment plants’ capacities. A simplified method of life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied in this paper to describe environmental impact of the allocation on the environment. Global warming potential (GWP) is employed as a unit to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Objective of this paper is to identify the main environmental burdens and credits measured by GWP for the three fundamental methods for treatment of residual waste unsuitable for material recovery. The three fundamental methods are waste-to-energy (WTE), landfilling and mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) with subsequent utilization of refuse-derived fuel. Composition of the waste itself and content of fossil-derived carbon and biogenic carbon are important parameters to identify amounts of GHG that are produced from all the three treatment methods. In case of WTE, subsequent use of the energy, e.g. in district heating systems in case of heat, is another important parameter to be considered. GHG emissions from landfilling are majorly affected by amounts of captured landfill gas versus released landfill gas. GHG emissions from mechanical-biological treatment are mostly affected by combustion of solid alternative fuels and subsequent co-generation of heat and power. Conclusion of this paper provides assessment of the potential benefits of the results in optimization tasks for planning of overall strategy in waste management.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Treatment of Non-Recyclable Municipal Waste
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper thoroughly analyses factors affecting production of greenhouse gases from waste treatment of residual municipal waste. The analysis is conducted so that the environmentally-friendly decision making criteria may be later implemented into an optimization task, which allocates waste treatment plants’ capacities. A simplified method of life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied in this paper to describe environmental impact of the allocation on the environment. Global warming potential (GWP) is employed as a unit to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Objective of this paper is to identify the main environmental burdens and credits measured by GWP for the three fundamental methods for treatment of residual waste unsuitable for material recovery. The three fundamental methods are waste-to-energy (WTE), landfilling and mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) with subsequent utilization of refuse-derived fuel. Composition of the waste itself and content of fossil-derived carbon and biogenic carbon are important parameters to identify amounts of GHG that are produced from all the three treatment methods. In case of WTE, subsequent use of the energy, e.g. in district heating systems in case of heat, is another important parameter to be considered. GHG emissions from landfilling are majorly affected by amounts of captured landfill gas versus released landfill gas. GHG emissions from mechanical-biological treatment are mostly affected by combustion of solid alternative fuels and subsequent co-generation of heat and power. Conclusion of this paper provides assessment of the potential benefits of the results in optimization tasks for planning of overall strategy in waste management.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20704 - Energy and fuels
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EF15_003%2F0000456" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000456: Laboratoř integrace procesů pro trvalou udržitelnost</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering
ISSN
2095-0179
e-ISSN
2095-0187
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CN - Čínská lidová republika
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
815-831
Kód UT WoS článku
000454888500020
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85059778821