Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F20%3APU137767" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/20:PU137767 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2020/0354-98362000275C.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2020/0354-98362000275C.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200323275C" target="_blank" >10.2298/TSCI200323275C</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally feasible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally feasible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20305 - Nuclear related engineering; (nuclear physics to be 1.3);

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Thermal Science

ISSN

0354-9836

e-ISSN

2334-7163

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6A

Stát vydavatele periodika

RS - Srbská republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

3543-3553

Kód UT WoS článku

000617150700014

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85098156616