Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

How sustainable are the biodegradable medical gowns via environmental and social life cycle assessment?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F22%3APU146542" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/22:PU146542 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622047278" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622047278</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135153" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135153</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    How sustainable are the biodegradable medical gowns via environmental and social life cycle assessment?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The growing disposable medical gown consumption due to the COVID-19 pandemic has driven tons of waste to landfills and posed plastic pollution. Investigating the pros and cons of biodegradable gowns over conventional counterparts can guide disposable medical gowns to be environmentally and socially sustainable. This work presents environmental and social life cycle assessments (E− and S-LCA) of biodegradable gowns to compare their environmental and social performances with conventional ones. The E-LCA evaluates the full-spectrum environmental impacts from gown production to end-of-life waste management processes, while the S-LCA assesses their associated influence on economic growth, employment, and worker welfare. The social impacts are evaluated based on the economic input-output analysis results of the economic sectors or gown life cycle stages involved in the gown value chain. Results show that biodegradable gown production poses 10.76% higher ecotoxicity than conventional alternatives contributed by pro-oxidant manufacturing. Integrating the landfill gas (LFG) capture and utilization processes into biodegradable gown waste treatment can reduce 48.81% of life cycle land use and over 5.67% of total greenhouse gas emissions. However, integrating this process in sanitary landfills to treat disinfected gown wastes can increase technical complexity, which enhances 70% of safety risks and 40% frequency of forced labor. Industrial composting biodegradable gowns can reduce over 20.5% of particulate matter formation versus sanitary landfills. Overall, fossil-based gowns possess full-spectrum environmental and social advantages over biodegradable counterparts treated by industrial composting and sanitary landfills. If improving the efficiencies of LFG capture by 85%, biogenic methane oxidation by 43%, and heat generation by 85%, biodegradable gowns can outperform conventional counterparts in reducing GHG emissions and fossil fuel use.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    How sustainable are the biodegradable medical gowns via environmental and social life cycle assessment?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The growing disposable medical gown consumption due to the COVID-19 pandemic has driven tons of waste to landfills and posed plastic pollution. Investigating the pros and cons of biodegradable gowns over conventional counterparts can guide disposable medical gowns to be environmentally and socially sustainable. This work presents environmental and social life cycle assessments (E− and S-LCA) of biodegradable gowns to compare their environmental and social performances with conventional ones. The E-LCA evaluates the full-spectrum environmental impacts from gown production to end-of-life waste management processes, while the S-LCA assesses their associated influence on economic growth, employment, and worker welfare. The social impacts are evaluated based on the economic input-output analysis results of the economic sectors or gown life cycle stages involved in the gown value chain. Results show that biodegradable gown production poses 10.76% higher ecotoxicity than conventional alternatives contributed by pro-oxidant manufacturing. Integrating the landfill gas (LFG) capture and utilization processes into biodegradable gown waste treatment can reduce 48.81% of life cycle land use and over 5.67% of total greenhouse gas emissions. However, integrating this process in sanitary landfills to treat disinfected gown wastes can increase technical complexity, which enhances 70% of safety risks and 40% frequency of forced labor. Industrial composting biodegradable gowns can reduce over 20.5% of particulate matter formation versus sanitary landfills. Overall, fossil-based gowns possess full-spectrum environmental and social advantages over biodegradable counterparts treated by industrial composting and sanitary landfills. If improving the efficiencies of LFG capture by 85%, biogenic methane oxidation by 43%, and heat generation by 85%, biodegradable gowns can outperform conventional counterparts in reducing GHG emissions and fossil fuel use.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20704 - Energy and fuels

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GF21-45726L" target="_blank" >GF21-45726L: Udržitelný hodnotový řetězec plastů pro přechod na oběhové hospodářství</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Cleaner Production

  • ISSN

    0959-6526

  • e-ISSN

    1879-1786

  • Svazek periodika

    neuveden

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    380

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

    135153-135153

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000894005400004

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85142171662