Round-Shaped vs. Hexagonally Shaped Saw Chain: Cutting Efficiency and Vibration Comparison
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F26%3A0198415" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/26:0198415 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/16/7/1066" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/16/7/1066</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f16071066" target="_blank" >10.3390/f16071066</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Round-Shaped vs. Hexagonally Shaped Saw Chain: Cutting Efficiency and Vibration Comparison
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Despite advances in technique and technology, the chainsaw is still the most widely used tool in forestry. For this reason, equipment manufacturers are developing new technical solutions to make working with a chainsaw as easy and efficient as possible. Some examples of this are the development of professional battery-powered chainsaws and the development of new types of saw chains by the leading industry manufacturers. The aim of this paper was to determine the efficiency of the Stihl MSA 300C battery-powered chainsaw equipped with two different types of professional saw chains (Stihl Rapid Super and Stihl Rapid Hexa) when sawing round wood. The efficiency was determined based on measurements of electricity consumption, sawing speed, sawn wood cross-section, and wood chips and dust mass produced during sawing. The second aim was to determine whether there is a difference in measured vibration magnitude between the two tested saw chains. Fresh-fallen European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) log, approx. 25 cm diameter without pronounced ellipticity, was used for sampling. Results indicate that although the saw chain manufacturer claims the new type of saw chain (Stihl Rapid Hexa) enables greater efficiency of the chainsaw, this was not the case. Results point to a 37% increase in mean sawing time, as well as a 23% increase in energy consumption when using the Rapid Hexa chain, with statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). It should be emphasized that the manual operation of the chainsaw does not allow for a reliable determination of differences in energy consumption caused by changes in saw chain geometry. The advantages of this saw chain are that it is easier to maintain (sharpen) and significantly less wood chips and dust are produced. The measured vibration magnitude shows a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05), i.e., a lower vibration total value on the front handle when using the Stihl Rapid Hexa chain.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Round-Shaped vs. Hexagonally Shaped Saw Chain: Cutting Efficiency and Vibration Comparison
Popis výsledku anglicky
Despite advances in technique and technology, the chainsaw is still the most widely used tool in forestry. For this reason, equipment manufacturers are developing new technical solutions to make working with a chainsaw as easy and efficient as possible. Some examples of this are the development of professional battery-powered chainsaws and the development of new types of saw chains by the leading industry manufacturers. The aim of this paper was to determine the efficiency of the Stihl MSA 300C battery-powered chainsaw equipped with two different types of professional saw chains (Stihl Rapid Super and Stihl Rapid Hexa) when sawing round wood. The efficiency was determined based on measurements of electricity consumption, sawing speed, sawn wood cross-section, and wood chips and dust mass produced during sawing. The second aim was to determine whether there is a difference in measured vibration magnitude between the two tested saw chains. Fresh-fallen European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) log, approx. 25 cm diameter without pronounced ellipticity, was used for sampling. Results indicate that although the saw chain manufacturer claims the new type of saw chain (Stihl Rapid Hexa) enables greater efficiency of the chainsaw, this was not the case. Results point to a 37% increase in mean sawing time, as well as a 23% increase in energy consumption when using the Rapid Hexa chain, with statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). It should be emphasized that the manual operation of the chainsaw does not allow for a reliable determination of differences in energy consumption caused by changes in saw chain geometry. The advantages of this saw chain are that it is easier to maintain (sharpen) and significantly less wood chips and dust are produced. The measured vibration magnitude shows a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05), i.e., a lower vibration total value on the front handle when using the Stihl Rapid Hexa chain.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Forests
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
1999-4907
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
1-13
Kód UT WoS článku
001535691000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105011667516