Comparison of virtualization tools Xen and KVM when working with a real network card

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F11%3APU91277" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/11:PU91277 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of virtualization tools Xen and KVM when working with a real network card

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Virtualization means a creation of virtual computer inside a real computer using suitable program equipment. IBM was the first company which introduced this concept for their mainframe computers in 1960s. Today, this technology is already firmly established and it is widely used in many sectors. There is a number of ways how to virtualize at present but in this paper we will focus on the two most often used virtualisation instruments on the platforms x86, x86-64 which are KVM and Xen. Both of these instruments are based on a different virtualization technique. Our aim was to find out how both of these instruments work with standard network applications and we were specifically interested in the corresponding maximum data throughput of the UDP requests/responses and in jitter. As you can see below, Xen came out of this comparison much better than KVM.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of virtualization tools Xen and KVM when working with a real network card

Popis výsledku anglicky

Virtualization means a creation of virtual computer inside a real computer using suitable program equipment. IBM was the first company which introduced this concept for their mainframe computers in 1960s. Today, this technology is already firmly established and it is widely used in many sectors. There is a number of ways how to virtualize at present but in this paper we will focus on the two most often used virtualisation instruments on the platforms x86, x86-64 which are KVM and Xen. Both of these instruments are based on a different virtualization technique. Our aim was to find out how both of these instruments work with standard network applications and we were specifically interested in the corresponding maximum data throughput of the UDP requests/responses and in jitter. As you can see below, Xen came out of this comparison much better than KVM.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

JA - Elektronika a optoelektronika, elektrotechnika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

6th International Conference on Teleinformatics 2011

ISBN

978-80-214-4231-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

Neuveden

Místo vydání

Vysoké učení technické v Brně

Místo konání akce

Dolní Morava

Datum konání akce

2. 2. 2011

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—