Preliminary Design and Comparison of 5 Phase and 6 Phase Fault Tolerant Outer Rotor Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines with Different Electrical Steel

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F22%3APU146177" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/22:PU146177 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9962852" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9962852</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PEMC51159.2022.9962852" target="_blank" >10.1109/PEMC51159.2022.9962852</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Preliminary Design and Comparison of 5 Phase and 6 Phase Fault Tolerant Outer Rotor Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines with Different Electrical Steel

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this paper, a comparison of 5 phase and 6 phase fault tolerant outer rotor permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSM) with fractional slot concentrated winding (FSCW) is presented. The paper will show that machines with higher number of slots have less mass of active materials due to the decreased length of end windings. Further, if both conditions of outer rotor and fixed outer diameter apply, there exists only one optimal topology of FSCW from the point of view machine's torque/mass density. Finally, when comparing machines with cobalt iron (FeCo) and silicon iron (FeSi) electrical steel, the latter are cheaper, have lower iron losses and can be shorter than FeCo machines. However, when the main task is to reach high torque density per mass, FeCo machines are the better solution.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Preliminary Design and Comparison of 5 Phase and 6 Phase Fault Tolerant Outer Rotor Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines with Different Electrical Steel

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this paper, a comparison of 5 phase and 6 phase fault tolerant outer rotor permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSM) with fractional slot concentrated winding (FSCW) is presented. The paper will show that machines with higher number of slots have less mass of active materials due to the decreased length of end windings. Further, if both conditions of outer rotor and fixed outer diameter apply, there exists only one optimal topology of FSCW from the point of view machine's torque/mass density. Finally, when comparing machines with cobalt iron (FeCo) and silicon iron (FeSi) electrical steel, the latter are cheaper, have lower iron losses and can be shorter than FeCo machines. However, when the main task is to reach high torque density per mass, FeCo machines are the better solution.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

2022 IEEE 20th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC)

ISBN

978-1-6654-9681-0

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

390-395

Název nakladatele

IEEE

Místo vydání

Brasov, Romania

Místo konání akce

Brašov

Datum konání akce

25. 9. 2022

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—