Reasoning about Regular Properties: A Comparative Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F23%3APU149408" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/23:PU149408 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38499-8_17" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38499-8_17</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38499-8_17" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-38499-8_17</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Reasoning about Regular Properties: A Comparative Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Several new algorithms for deciding emptiness of Boolean combinations of regular languages and of languages of alternating automata have been proposed recently, especially in the context of analysing regular expressions and in string constraint solving. The new algorithms demonstrated a significant potential, but they have never been systematically compared, neither among each other nor with the state-of-the art implementations of existing (non)deterministic automata-based methods. In this paper, we provide such comparison as well as an overview of the existing algorithms and their implementations. We collect a diverse benchmark mostly originating in or related to practical problems from string constraint solving, analysing LTL properties, and regular model checking, and evaluate collected implementations on it. The results reveal the best tools and hint on what the best algorithms and implementation techniques are. Roughly, although some advanced algorithms are fast, such as antichain algorithms and reductions to IC3/PDR, they are not as overwhelmingly dominant as sometimes presented and there is no clear winner. The simplest NFA-based technology may sometimes be a better choice, depending on the problem source and the implementation style. We believe that our findings are relevant for development of automata techniques as well as for related fields such as string constraint solving.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Reasoning about Regular Properties: A Comparative Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Several new algorithms for deciding emptiness of Boolean combinations of regular languages and of languages of alternating automata have been proposed recently, especially in the context of analysing regular expressions and in string constraint solving. The new algorithms demonstrated a significant potential, but they have never been systematically compared, neither among each other nor with the state-of-the art implementations of existing (non)deterministic automata-based methods. In this paper, we provide such comparison as well as an overview of the existing algorithms and their implementations. We collect a diverse benchmark mostly originating in or related to practical problems from string constraint solving, analysing LTL properties, and regular model checking, and evaluate collected implementations on it. The results reveal the best tools and hint on what the best algorithms and implementation techniques are. Roughly, although some advanced algorithms are fast, such as antichain algorithms and reductions to IC3/PDR, they are not as overwhelmingly dominant as sometimes presented and there is no clear winner. The simplest NFA-based technology may sometimes be a better choice, depending on the problem source and the implementation style. We believe that our findings are relevant for development of automata techniques as well as for related fields such as string constraint solving.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LL1908" target="_blank" >LL1908: Efektivní konečné automaty pro automatické usuzování</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Automated Deduction - CADE 29
ISBN
—
ISSN
0302-9743
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
286-306
Název nakladatele
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Místo vydání
Cham
Místo konání akce
Rome
Datum konání akce
1. 7. 2023
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
001156342400017