LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F26%3A0193745" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/26:0193745 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.526/" target="_blank" >https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.526/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.526" target="_blank" >10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.526</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used for data augmentation tasks, where text samples are LLM-paraphrased and then used for classifier fine-tuning. Previous studies have compared LLM-based augmentations with established augmentation techniques, but the results are contradictory: some report superiority of LLM-based augmentations, while other only marginal increases (and even decreases) in performance of downstream classifiers. A research that would confirm a clear cost-benefit advantage of LLMs over more established augmentation methods is largely missing. To study if (and when) is the LLM-based augmentation advantageous, we compared the effects of recent LLM augmentation methods with established ones on 6 datasets, 3 classifiers and 2 fine-tuning methods. We also varied the number of seeds and collected samples to better explore the downstream model accuracy space. Finally, we performed a cost-benefit analysis and show that LLM-based methods are worthy of deployment only when very small number of seeds is used. Moreover, in many cases, established methods lead to similar or better model accuracies.
Název v anglickém jazyce
LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used for data augmentation tasks, where text samples are LLM-paraphrased and then used for classifier fine-tuning. Previous studies have compared LLM-based augmentations with established augmentation techniques, but the results are contradictory: some report superiority of LLM-based augmentations, while other only marginal increases (and even decreases) in performance of downstream classifiers. A research that would confirm a clear cost-benefit advantage of LLMs over more established augmentation methods is largely missing. To study if (and when) is the LLM-based augmentation advantageous, we compared the effects of recent LLM augmentation methods with established ones on 6 datasets, 3 classifiers and 2 fine-tuning methods. We also varied the number of seeds and collected samples to better explore the downstream model accuracy space. Finally, we performed a cost-benefit analysis and show that LLM-based methods are worthy of deployment only when very small number of seeds is used. Moreover, in many cases, established methods lead to similar or better model accuracies.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
ISBN
979-8-8917-6189-6
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
10476-10496
Název nakladatele
Association for Computational Linguistics
Místo vydání
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Místo konání akce
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Datum konání akce
29. 4. 2025
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
001611654000207