Comparison of Zimmermann and Six Fractionation Methods Aimed at Distinguishing Between Active, Slow, and Passive Pools of Soil Organic Matter
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26310%2F22%3APU146702" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26310/22:PU146702 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42729-022-00871-3" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42729-022-00871-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00871-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s42729-022-00871-3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of Zimmermann and Six Fractionation Methods Aimed at Distinguishing Between Active, Slow, and Passive Pools of Soil Organic Matter
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Recently, soil organic matter (SOM) fractionation has become an important tool to separate SOM pools with different stability and decomposability. Several methods have been developed for this purpose. Here, we used laboratory experiments manipulating two types of post-mining soils in the early stages of soil development to compare two fractionation methods according to Zimmermann and Six. Overall, both fractionation methods showed good agreement. In the active pool, Six's method tended to show systematically higher values than Zimmermann's; the opposite was true for the passive and slow pools, but the difference between fractionation methods was less pronounced here. Moreover, among all treatments, clayey soil resulted in a higher active pool in the Six's method, in contrast to a higher slow pool in Zimmermann's fractionation method. In the passive pool, Six's method tended to be higher in sandy soil, while there was no clear trend in clayey soil. This implies that soil texture plays an important role in variation between methods. The ANOVA further revealed that fractionation methods, treatments, and their interactions had a significant effect on all the SOC pools.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of Zimmermann and Six Fractionation Methods Aimed at Distinguishing Between Active, Slow, and Passive Pools of Soil Organic Matter
Popis výsledku anglicky
Recently, soil organic matter (SOM) fractionation has become an important tool to separate SOM pools with different stability and decomposability. Several methods have been developed for this purpose. Here, we used laboratory experiments manipulating two types of post-mining soils in the early stages of soil development to compare two fractionation methods according to Zimmermann and Six. Overall, both fractionation methods showed good agreement. In the active pool, Six's method tended to show systematically higher values than Zimmermann's; the opposite was true for the passive and slow pools, but the difference between fractionation methods was less pronounced here. Moreover, among all treatments, clayey soil resulted in a higher active pool in the Six's method, in contrast to a higher slow pool in Zimmermann's fractionation method. In the passive pool, Six's method tended to be higher in sandy soil, while there was no clear trend in clayey soil. This implies that soil texture plays an important role in variation between methods. The ANOVA further revealed that fractionation methods, treatments, and their interactions had a significant effect on all the SOC pools.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40100 - Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
ISSN
0718-9516
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CL - Chilská republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
3110-3117
Kód UT WoS článku
000801079400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85130693050