Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Utilization of Multidimensional Methods for Corporate Sustainability

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F15%3APU115965" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/15:PU115965 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Utilization of Multidimensional Methods for Corporate Sustainability

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The article is focused on the use of multivariate methods for creating the Corporate Sustainability Index (CSI) predictive model for measuring sustainability of industrial companies according to CZ-NACE, and on comparing these methods. The goal of this article is to propose a suitable CSI predictive model and to determine which financial and non-financial indicators can most influence a company tending to sustainability. To determine the CSILA predictive model, the Logistic Regression is used, and to determine the CSIMDA model, the method of Multiple Discriminant Analysis. However, based on the theoretical analysis of each method it is necessary to state that the methods cannot be unequivocally compared, even though each of these methods identified similar significant financial and non-financial indicators, coefficients and tests, which are interpreted analogically in the methods and are created in different ways. The results of the comparison of the methods for determining the predictive model CSI show that the logistic regression seems to be the best, which has a high percentage of correctly classified companies based on the calculated probability; in this case, the Gini index is also highest. The resulting classification of companies into different groups in comparing these two methods underwent significant changes as opposed to the classification of the companies according to the Data Envelopment Analysis method. The conclusions of the research of measuring the sustainability of the company show that currently - in addition to financial indicators - also non-financial indicators must be included in predictive models, namely the environmental indicator, the social indicator and the corporate governance indicator. It means that for the companies it has become a necessity to build a unified system for measuring sustainability of a company; this requirement has been confirmed also by managers of companies.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Utilization of Multidimensional Methods for Corporate Sustainability

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The article is focused on the use of multivariate methods for creating the Corporate Sustainability Index (CSI) predictive model for measuring sustainability of industrial companies according to CZ-NACE, and on comparing these methods. The goal of this article is to propose a suitable CSI predictive model and to determine which financial and non-financial indicators can most influence a company tending to sustainability. To determine the CSILA predictive model, the Logistic Regression is used, and to determine the CSIMDA model, the method of Multiple Discriminant Analysis. However, based on the theoretical analysis of each method it is necessary to state that the methods cannot be unequivocally compared, even though each of these methods identified similar significant financial and non-financial indicators, coefficients and tests, which are interpreted analogically in the methods and are created in different ways. The results of the comparison of the methods for determining the predictive model CSI show that the logistic regression seems to be the best, which has a high percentage of correctly classified companies based on the calculated probability; in this case, the Gini index is also highest. The resulting classification of companies into different groups in comparing these two methods underwent significant changes as opposed to the classification of the companies according to the Data Envelopment Analysis method. The conclusions of the research of measuring the sustainability of the company show that currently - in addition to financial indicators - also non-financial indicators must be included in predictive models, namely the environmental indicator, the social indicator and the corporate governance indicator. It means that for the companies it has become a necessity to build a unified system for measuring sustainability of a company; this requirement has been confirmed also by managers of companies.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50602 - Public administration

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2015

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of the 19th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatic

  • ISBN

    978-1-941763-28-5

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    1-7

  • Název nakladatele

    International Institute of Informatics and Systemics

  • Místo vydání

    Orlando, USA

  • Místo konání akce

    Orlando

  • Datum konání akce

    12. 7. 2015

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku